[RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

[John Becker]

On 10/19/2013 2:49 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
> As has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions, John, the sub-bands in which unattended operation is permitted  are not
> exclusively assigned to unattended operation. When it defined these sub-bands, the FCC made it clear that operators of unattended
> stations must mitigate any interference caused by these stations.
>
> Your continued attempts to blame the interference problem on attended stations who venture into frequencies exclusively allocated to
> unattended stations is factually incorrect and intellectually dishonest.
>
>                  Dave, AA6YQ
Dont preach that same old stuff to me Dave.
Try it on those the wonder into the auto sub band then complain very load
about what happens. As has been pointed to you also a number of times.
Seem that the "intellectually dishonest" can be spread around a bit.
Thus the reason a  "NO CODE" ham is not in the CW band.

JAB