[RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

John,

Automatic control does not relieve any licensee of the obligation
to avoid interfering with other users of the frequency.   Until
licensees of stations under automatic control stop defeating the
"channel busy" capabilities, they are in the wrong *period*.

Frankly, after nearly 30 years of automatic operation and the failure
to implement effective interference prevention technology, *ALL*
automatic operations should be *prohibited*.  No licensee has a
"priority right" to use any frequency - that's absolutely clear in
the rules and until you get it through your head you will hear the
same sermon over and over and over again.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 10/19/2013 5:02 PM, John Becker wrote:
> On 10/19/2013 2:49 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>> As has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions, John, the
>> sub-bands in which unattended operation is permitted  are not
>> exclusively assigned to unattended operation. When it defined these
>> sub-bands, the FCC made it clear that operators of unattended
>> stations must mitigate any interference caused by these stations.
>>
>> Your continued attempts to blame the interference problem on attended
>> stations who venture into frequencies exclusively allocated to
>> unattended stations is factually incorrect and intellectually dishonest.
>>
>>                  Dave, AA6YQ
> Dont preach that same old stuff to me Dave.
> Try it on those the wonder into the auto sub band then complain very load
> about what happens. As has been pointed to you also a number of times.
> Seem that the "intellectually dishonest" can be spread around a bit.
> Thus the reason a  "NO CODE" ham is not in the CW band.
>
> JAB
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>