[RTTY] Courtesy

[Stephen Colello]

I agree with tu. I run LP and this weekend I got a few "CQ Test" type 
exchanges. I wasn't sure whether he got me or just gave up. "TU" clears it 
up.

Steve
KA2KON


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Stai" <wk6i.jeff at gmail.com>
To: "John GW4SKA" <ska at bartg.org.uk>
Cc: "Stanley Zawrotny" <k4sbz.stan at gmail.com>; "REFL-RTTY" 
<rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Courtesy


> Every run QSO I make has a TU, I think it's courteous to give a positive
> acknowledgement to the other station. And it's nicer than CFM.
>
> My S&P Qs do not have a TU. This is because having a TU in the exchange as
> well as the acknowledgement would be redundant, not that I am any less
> thankful. (I use the same buffer in WL for all exchanges.)
>
> - jeff wk6i
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:50 PM, John GW4SKA <ska at bartg.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> You must have been unlucky with the guys you worked. Every one of my 
>> 1600+
>> contacts got a 'TU' and I saw lots send the same to me. There are still a
>> lot of courteous RTTY ops out there!
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff at gmail.com
> Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
> Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty