[RTTY] [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates

[Robert Chudek - K0RC]

Peter Laws wrote, in part

"...I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X
station, so that would be a real treat.

Fix that and I'll sign up."

I fail to see any difference than if that *4Z* card showed up in your 
USPS mailbox. You still have the "option" whether to keep it or tear it 
up (reject it).

In either "system", you control the legitimacy of your own QSL collection.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

P.S. "Yes, stirring the pot!"


------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2/12/2014 2:22 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:49 PM,  <Ktfrog007 at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I concur with your findings.  Digital folks really like eQSL, as do  I.  A
>> lot of folks seem to vehemently dislike it, but I like to see QSLs  and save
>> my favorites into a folder and run it as a slide show when I'm not  using
>
> As long as you can fish for QSLs with it I'm not interested.
> Otherwise it's fine.
>
> I have, waiting for me to do something about them, 1331 "eQSLs"
> waiting in my inbox.  One of them is from a 4Z.  It's bold, so that
> means the authenticity is guaranteed.  I really should confirm it
> because I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X station, so that would
> be a real treat.
>
> Fix that and I'll sign up.
>
> BTW, on LOTW I'm about 50%.  All QSOs are post 1991 and the bulk of
> them are post 2004 (with a scattered Qs between those two years - many
> confirmed).  *My* fervent wish is that more folks On The Ultra-highs
> would use LOTW!  I have VUCC on 50 MHz but I'd be much closer to 200
> grids if more ops were on.
>