[RTTY] RTTY RM 11708 in ARRL BOD

[iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato]

I strongly support what Dick wrote.
I strongly suggest that anybody willingly to help against this repeated 
abomination may team and cooperate on our FAQ, BTW it's an made as 
Octavian made it. I care about and I wish to help on it.

Think about it as a RTTY DX & Contesting marathon, over a long time of 
course.
The only difference is not that we will have a back a roster of call signs.
We will have back great part of our world, the RTTY slices by now.

I hope that several of us may agree and prepare themselves for any task 
as to complete the foresight group job.
We could even shuffle it in several tasks and divide the loads on each 
of us.
Having one member of the group willingly to publish it on the web. 
Giving it the life.
With another one member supervising the whole group of tasks and to 
maintain connections between peoples, here or by any other mean.
Here in a light way, as I hope we could have have real arguments and 
facts to write on the list.
Any other mean, by emails or even more sophisticated networking methods.

By any mean I think that the last suggestion of Dick is the right, 
theirs FAQ will give us the agenda.
But will also need not to be silently waiting for that marketing, read 
lying, documents.
Better to start since now, at least recollecting what could be used 
lather as bibliography.
Just making all this known with a simple text page just as the banner 
for the next and last part of the group answers to the ARRL.
We should be able to make the ARRL FAQ as written on the shore by 
technical arguments, not grouping as they do with marketing specialists 
and populist writers.

Since now, as it was before, count on me. Even with my illiteracies, I 
mean in the language and in some deep technical aspects, I will do my best.

               73 de iw1ayd Salvo

PS I don't like to be assimilated under those 2.8 KHz gadget pumping 
emissions.

>Message: 3
>Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:55:35 -0800
>From: Dick Flanagan<dick at k7vc.com>
>To:rtty at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY RM 11708 in ARRL BOD
>Message-ID:<52E173B7.3020604 at k7vc.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>I think it will be appropriate that one of our top technical minds rebut
>each and every FAQ response with reasoned, documented and respectful
>arguments (where appropriate).  The arguments should be short and sweet,
>with an addendum explaining each in detail.
>
>Their FAQ will finally give us their arguments for this ill-advised
>proposal, allowing us to rebut each one.
>
>--
>Dick Flanagan K7VC
>dick at k7vc.com