[RTTY] ARRL willful interference

[john]

sir you have made your point(many times) please take it else where
There are , and have many been been many things that that the arrl has 
done and and are doing that I did not, and  do not like---however your 
ranting and raving about a separate issue , is really non related, and  
is counter productive to fighting their RM proposal ...
if this is such an (personal) issue with  you, please take it to another 
reflector under another issue..   there is a lot of truth about "divide 
and conquer" and this is exactly what you are doing however well 
meaning,  with the PRIMARY
thrust of the  RM issue.
please keep focused on defeating the Rm thing.  how simple is that???
73 john  w8wej
On 6/10/2014 19:30, W0MU wrote:
> Why do we keep having to cover or make excuses for rule violations?
>
> For the record I am complaining about the willful interference by the 
> ARRL W1AW control operators.  The bulletins and code practice are 
> quite legal.  Willful interference is not.
>
>
> On 6/10/2014 11:23 AM, Kok Chen wrote:
>> On Jun 10, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
>>
>>> You are one of about two people in the world complaining about the
>>> ARRL's bulletin service.
>> This is really no different from the NCDXF beacons, which by 
>> gentlemen's agreement operate at known fixed frequencies. (And there 
>> are probably also at least two people in the world who complain about 
>> them.)
>>
>> If you are near 14100 kHz and a beacon fires up, it may legally be 
>> interfering with you, but it is for the good of the community that 
>> you don't operate there.  We avoid the beacon frequencies even 
>> though, just like the case for W1AW, the NCDXF beacons are no longer 
>> very useful in the internet age (think WSPR).
>>
>> You can see the statement from NCDXF regarding interference here:
>>
>> http://www.ncdxf.org/beacon/beaconinterference.html
>>
>> Just treat the NCDXF and W1AW frequencies as part of a general band 
>> plan.
>>
>> Indeed, as a low power operator, I would rather know precisely where 
>> W1AW might fire up and avoid those frequencies, rather than have them 
>> QSY from known frequencies and land on top of me when they attempt to 
>> avoid interfering with some other station. More likely than not, I am 
>> too weak for W1AW to hear me.
>>
>> 73
>> Chen, W7AY
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3955/7656 - Release Date: 06/10/14
>
>