[RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan

[Ron Kolarik]

Lack of experimentation? Page 64 of April QST, H4FSK from KN6KB.

Ron
K0IDT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kok Chen" <chen at mac.com>
To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty at contesting.com>
Cc: "Terry" <ab5k at hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan


>
> On Mar 16, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Terry wrote:
>
>> Perhaps there will be some great RTTY like modes
>> that come out of the new unregulated experiments.  If something positive is
>> developed, it can be let out of the experimental sub-band (sandbox) and
>> allowed into the main stream RTTY sub band.
>
> I am not sure that the old rules has *ever* impeded the development of more innovative keyboard-to-keyboard modes.
>
> A good example is DominoEX, which automatically tunes as fast as the best RTTY operator, and has similar latency once you turn FEC 
> off, plus it prints better than RTTY at the same SNR.
>
> IMHO, there has never been a lack of experimentation, even with improving RTTY itself -- what do you think fldigi and 2Tone are, 
> they certainly are not copying how old analog modems did things.
>
>