[RTTY] Pactor 3 demo

[Dave AA6YQ]

Your exact words were

"But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations have
been in their own sub band."

The phrase "in their own sub band" could certainly be construed as a sub
band to which unattended stations have exclusive access.

The word "suggestion" is equally false; the FCC has never suggested that the
97.221 subbands be exclusively used by unattended stations. On the contrary,
the FCC explicitly stated that these subbands are to be *shared* among
attended and unattended stations.

You've been posting these falsehoods for years. They remain false,
none-the-less.

Is there no way to advocate your position without employing falsehoods?




-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:33 PM
To: rtty at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo


>>>> Demonstrably false. Nowhere in part 97 are unattended stations in 
>>>> the US
> granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies. 
> Unattended stations are expected to share frequencies with attended 
> stations; among other things, that means confirming that the frequency 
> is clear before transmitting.
No where in my post did I say or mention the word "EXCLUSIVE"
You sure do love to nit pick everything I say.
Would the word "suggestion" work better with  you all mighty.
JAB
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty