[RTTY] Pactor 3 demo

[Glenn Wyant]

Where can I  loose this thread , and get back to RTTY ?

VA3DX




Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo


> Your exact words were
>
> "But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations 
> have
> been in their own sub band."
>
> The phrase "in their own sub band" could certainly be construed as a sub
> band to which unattended stations have exclusive access.
>
> The word "suggestion" is equally false; the FCC has never suggested that 
> the
> 97.221 subbands be exclusively used by unattended stations. On the 
> contrary,
> the FCC explicitly stated that these subbands are to be *shared* among
> attended and unattended stations.
>
> You've been posting these falsehoods for years. They remain false,
> none-the-less.
>
> Is there no way to advocate your position without employing falsehoods?
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Becker
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:33 PM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo
>
>
>>>>> Demonstrably false. Nowhere in part 97 are unattended stations in
>>>>> the US
>> granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies.
>> Unattended stations are expected to share frequencies with attended
>> stations; among other things, that means confirming that the frequency
>> is clear before transmitting.
> No where in my post did I say or mention the word "EXCLUSIVE"
> You sure do love to nit pick everything I say.
> Would the word "suggestion" work better with  you all mighty.
> JAB
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>