[RTTY] What is this auto mode that QRM's me?

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

> I just wish the League would be transparent enough to tell us what
> the hell they are doing. Either we or the league are completely
> wrong on this thing.

Since the League are supposed to be representing *US* and it is not
chartered in Putin's Russia, it is obvious that the League's "Staff
and Management" - including its CEO who has put his name to most of
the BS in print - are dead wrong and need to be replaced.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/30/2014 7:58 PM, Neal Campbell wrote:
> Carter,
>
> I agree with you 100%. I find that the business angle of ham radio
> (including its lobbying arm) is so small that almost every company is 1 or
> 2 bad quarters away from closing its doors. Equipment manufacturers
> (outside of Flex and Elecraft) are in the ham business, not for windfall
> projects, but because it costs very little for them to take their existing
> technology and sell it to us.
>
> Dennis Bodson, one of the two supporting directors, is one of my customers
> and I have worked with him a lot over the past 2-3 years. I would be
> incredibly surprised if he is "following the money" and I sincerely doubt
> there is any money to follow. He is a very humble, friendly and gracious
> person.
>
> So what is the game going on?
>
> When I read the "robot response" FAQs, its almost like they are talking
> about a completely different proposal than the one we are fighting.
> Thinking cynically (and its hard not to), they could be feeding us the FAQs
> to convince us we don't have a clue whats going on.
>
> I don't like to think cynically so it must be something I just do not see.
> For sure, the two directors pushing this have a very hard road for
> reelection.
>
> I just wish the League would be transparent enough to tell us what the hell
> they are doing. Either we or the league are completely wrong on this thing.
>
> 73
>
> Neal Campbell
> Abroham Neal LLC
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Carter <k8vt at ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>> On 3/30/2014 3:28 PM, Thomas W4HM wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't want to start an ARRL rant thread but when I came to understand
>>> this I dropped my ARRL membership. Yes I know about the argument that you
>>> can't change how the ARRL operates if you are not a member. But I just
>>> don't buy that logic as the ARRL does not listen to it's membership no
>>> matter what.
>>>
>>>   Nothing is perfect, not even the ARRL.
>>
>> Nothing is all black or all white.
>>
>> You say you quit the ARRL because you disagreed with them on -an- issue.
>> Do you really expect them to agree with you (and you with them) 100% of the
>> time on every issue?
>>
>> Even though you may disagree with them on -this- issue, I would
>> respectfully submit that the ARRL, in general, does a lot of good for ham
>> radio.
>>
>> Like it or not, they are the only game in town, the only national
>> organization we have...and IMHO, deserving of our support.
>>
>> Just my 2 cents...
>>
>> 73,
>> Carter   K8VT
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>