[RTTY] K1N vs ARRL

[Bob Burns W9BU]

On 2/7/2015 11:38 AM, Charles Morrison wrote:

> K1N was there first.

Didn't we just have a heated discussion about this a few weeks ago?

As I recall, some posters took the position that RTTY operators should 
know that certain frequencies are accepted watering holes for various 
modes and are covered by gentlemen's agreements. More specifically, the 
stated position seemed to be that that RTTY operators should know about 
relatively fixed JT65 operating frequencies and, therefore, avoid them. 
If that position is valid, then those same RTTY operators should know 
about the relatively fixed ARRL bulletin operating frequencies and, 
therefore, avoid them.

If the concept applies to JT65, doesn't it apply to ARRL bulletins?

I acknowledge that I may be poking at the fire.

Bob...