[RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

Matthew Pitts n8ohu at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 16 06:49:13 EDT 2016


Ron,

How often are hams in the RTTY/data segment interfered with by 6 kHz bandwidth signals that originate from hams now? If the answer is they haven't been, you have your answer about the question. 

Matthew Pitts
N8OHU 

On August 14, 2016 3:59:23 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik at neb.rr.com> wrote:
>Matthew, it's happening now with the 97.221(c) stations. What makes you
>
>think the wide band stuff
>will behave any better? The big problem is no one, not the FCC or the 
>ARRL, is watching or responding
>to complaints.
>
>Ron K0IDT
>
>
>On 8/14/2016 9:34 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
>> Some major flaws that I see in his argument are:
>>
>> 4: As I said before, claims of a massive increase in the number of
>automatic stations or wide bandwidth digital voice stations swamping
>the RTTY/Data bands are nothing more than FUD.
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty



More information about the RTTY mailing list