[RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

[Ron Kolarik]

Matthew, the reason you don't see wide band digi voice in the sub band 
is simple. In the case
of System Fusion, 12.5kHz, the baud rate is 9600 and not legal under 
current rules but.....you
knew that was coming, the emission designators are allowed under current 
rules, F1D F7W .

I really don't know what the FCC or the ARRL had in mind when they went 
down this dirt road.

Ron K0IDT


On 8/16/2016 3:45 PM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
> Ron,
>
> Ted has mentioned wide bandwidth voice modes, and so did you in a message to another list, which is why I asked the question I did. The point I am trying to to make is that these things would already be happening if folks wanted to do them in the RTTY/data bands. The same is true if people wanted to "fill up the RTTY/Data bands with wideband digital", as I believe he said; we wouldn't be able to use any of the digital modes we like if there really were that many people that could afford to build a station that they could not use for anything else. And, for what it's worth, where else are hams using peer to peer digital (Pactor 3 and Winmor 1600) supposed to operate?
>
> Matthew Pitts
> N8OHU
>
> On August 16, 2016 12:28:28 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik at neb.rr.com> wrote:
>> Matthew, try to stick to the subject. Stations operating under
>> 97.221(c)
>> regularly blast anything in their way
>> and if the P3 stations would stay where they belong it would help. No
>> one said anything about current
>> stations running 6kHz wide modes.....where the hell did that come
>> from??
>>
>> Ron K0IDT
>>
>>
>>