[RTTY] Information please

[David G3YYD]

How well do the JT modes cope with propagation that spreads the signal
spectrum? This can be over tens of Hz in the worse case.

73 David G3YYD

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: 26 May 2017 14:11
To: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Information please

------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Fri, 26 May 2017 09:20:25 +0100, you wrote:

>You could think about using the other data modes. With low power and 
>poor propagation, PSK can work a lot better than RTTY.
>The ultimate move across to the dark side is JT65. I started using JT65 
>about 10 days ago and have 60+ countries in the log, operating just a 
>couple of hours a day.
>Very low power is all you need, but it's a horrible slow process with 
>no skill required. My only motivation is to get to 100 DXCC then back to
RTTY!
>John GW4SKA

REPLY:

Even better than JT65 is JT9.  A fraction of the bandwidth and according to
the author, about 2 dB better with weak signals. The protocol is the same.
Give it a try, you'll like it. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty