[RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone?
Rudy Bakalov
r_bakalov at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 30 22:49:13 EDT 2017
I have two computers in the shack- a 2006 Core Duo running XP with 512 Mb RAM, passmark score of 1,100 and a high end workstation running Windows 10 running on 4 Xeon 2690 CPUs, 32 Gb RAM, SSD, with a passmark score of 25,000.
There is zero perceived difference while running N1MM+ with one MMTTY decoder, two 2Tone decoders, and one GRITTY for diversity decoding.
In addition to the logger, I run VE7CC client and microHam router.
The NUC will do just fine. I have a NUC clone as well and its passmark is 1500. You don’t need much CPU to run the logger and 4 decoders.
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.
> On Sep 30, 2017, at 5:36 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists at subich.com> wrote:
>
>
>> So my question is this ... how much of the processing for RTTY is
>> done by the sound device (avoiding $0.99 USB dongles) and how much is
>> done by the CPU? Will their least expensive Core i3 be adequate?
> *ALL* of the processing (decoding) is performed by the CPU. The sound
> card - whether it is a "$0.99 dongle" or a "$200 professional" card -
> is simply the analog to digital converter on receive and digital to
> analog converter on transmit.
>
> When looking at Windows based computers for amateur use, you are
> primarily interested in the amount of RAM (16 GB is appropriate for
> Windows 10) and the number of "cores" (simultaneous execution units).
> With Intel processors, the sweet spot appears to be quad core processors
> (8 simultaneous execution units - each "core" handles two execution
> units) while AMD processors tend to do better with six core processors
> (each core can execute only one "thread").
>
>
> 73,
>
> ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
>> On 9/30/2017 4:40 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
>> I've been dancing around replacing the PC at N5UWY (2006 Dell Precision 670
>> with a Xeon or two - I forget - and 16 GB RAM) for quite some time now but
>> have now been introduced to Intel's little NUC boxes. If you don't mind a
>> Celery processor, they're really cheap. As soon as you make the jump to a
>> Core i3 (or i5 or i7), the price jumps up a lot but still +/-$300 if you
>> don't go nuts.
>> Some cases have room for a 2.5" disk, some don't. No room inside for
>> "cards" but no one cares. Some do have MB headers for serial ports if you
>> are desperate. Plenty of USB 2 and 3 and DP/Thunderbolt and HDMI and SATA
>> connectors depending on which version you get. These things also run on
>> "12-19 V dc", which opens up interesting possibilities.
>> So my question is this ... how much of the processing for RTTY is done by
>> the sound device (avoiding $0.99 USB dongles) and how much is done by the
>> CPU? Will their least expensive Core i3 be adequate? I'm assuming the
>> answer is yes but really need more expert advice. What about for more
>> DSP-intensive stuff like the JT modes?
>> Here's an example:
>> https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=56-102-168
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
.
More information about the RTTY
mailing list