[SCCC] Reason for crappy conditions
Glenn Rattmann
k6na at cts.com
Wed Dec 2 16:50:24 PST 2009
Good one Kurt! ;-)
Well, in addition to the 28/35-day problem, there was the "seasonal"
change too, in the interim-- more hours of darkness in the northern
hemisphere and less ionization as a result. By the way, I noticed
that ZS4TX (nearing his summer) put up a huge score in the
WW. Pretty good high band numbers. More sunlight?
73,
Glenn/San Diego County, where the sun shines 365 days a year and the
bands never close. Well almost.
At 04:04 PM 12/2/2009, you wrote:
>I wondered why conditions were so good for CQWW SSB and not
>so good for CW. I thought that solar conditions replicated to
>an extent every 28 days. They do, but there were five weeks
>between the SSB weekend and the CW weekend this year.
>Conditions were good the weekend before.
>
>This solar minimum has gone far too long. Can't the
>government do something about it?
>
> 73, Kurt, W6PH
More information about the SCCC
mailing list