[SCCC] Stacking Tribander on 54' crank up?
Glenn Rattmann
k6na at cts.com
Thu Apr 8 12:12:07 PDT 2010
Tim,
I applaud your enthusiasm and energy on this upgrade!
I don't have a lot of specifics to add... your intended antenna
hardware looks good to me. On the question of whether an extra
tribander at 37ft will help, it may depend somewhat on whether you
are in a DX contest, or in a domestic contest. The club member who
has direct experience with this is Dave, K6LL over in Yuma. I
believe he has a small tribander down low on his 50ft tower, and a
KT-34XA and 40m beam on top. Perhaps he can comment on how he used this combo.
I'd guess the diversity gained (two separate directions) and less
need for rotating would be helpful. But at only 17ft spacing I
wouldn't expect any significant stacking gain (when both are pointed
at the same target). There may be a bit of stacking gain on 10m, but
that may not be fully realized due to the fact that the antennas are
different design and boom length. So, being able to point different
directions, with quick switching, is probably the main advantage
gained. To take advantage of the system you will want a stacking
switch (U-L-B) that lets you pick either antenna, or the pair
together (splittiing power in two directions, or one). Because it
has to work on 3 bands, it will have to be one of the broadband-type
switchers, like Array Solutions stack-match. No doubt, there will be
some interaction between these two tribanders and your patterns could
be affected somewhat. Modelling might identify some potential
serious interactions-- but in general, I'd guess you could live with it.
You didn't mention SO2R. K6LL and others have done this with one
tower and tribanders, but it's not trivial. Of course, you would use
passband filters on the radios. But, you should probably do some
serious calculations to determine if unwanted signal levels are still
too high for the receiver inputs, even with the presence of the
filters. I recommend the W2VJN book on this subject, before you
start running a kW in SO2R with multiband antennas only 17ft apart.
At my station I'm fortunate to have a lower 20m beam, and a lower 15m
beam (60 and 90ft), which I can rotate independently from the upper
ones. In domestic contests I typically park them pointing to Ohio,
while the very high 20/15 pair are aimed at north. This is helpful
in working some of the rare multipliers up that way, and in picking
up some of the weaker W7 callers. I have diversity switching, U-L-B,
to take advantage of any particular situation.
In DX contests I rotate these antennas as needed, to work the two
best (azimuth) openings at the time. I very seldom employ stacking
gain (both antennas pointing to the same target) in DX contests, but
most often just split power or go to one antenna. I might use
stacking gain to help work the VU in a ten-minute opening, but after
that is accomplished I usually swing antennas to separate directions
again. No doubt, the switching is helpful, and often saves rotation
time. Does it make 10% improvement in score? There's really no way
to know, but probably not that much. Just a guess.
When 10/15m improve, I'd guess the fixed low tribander might be
pretty useful in domestic contests. If you are able to run with it,
and then rotate your higher one north, it will help you (assumes you
have the switch). Of course, your 40m beam would then be pointed
north a lot of the time, so you will still have to rotate your main
mast to bring the 40m beam toward the east coast, when you do switch
bands. But hey, this keeps you awake! ;-)
--Glenn K6NA
PS The LM-354HD is a really great tower. Congrats on a good choice!
At 05:43 PM 4/7/2010, you wrote:
>Hi all, I am in the process of budgeting and planning for a LM 354HD 54'
>Crankup tower. It's going in my back yard in place of my current 29' of Rohn
>25G. I cannot at this time see having two towers installed as my property is
>not very big (75X100' lot).
>
>Equipment on the tower will be:
>
>24' 4130 Chromolly mast 2" OD x .250" walls
>M2 Orion Rotator
>TB-2 thrust bearing
>Force 12 C31XR 0.5' above TB-2
>Cushcraft A3WS w/30m 7.5' above TB-2
>Cushcraft XM240 17' above TB-2
>80m shortended Double bazooka on pulley mounted off top section of tower @
>54'
>
>With the above in mind, I was considering placing a second tribander at 37'
>fixed on the north-east (stateside contest running). The tower manufacturer
>is willing to weld an adapter to allow for this.
>
>My question is... is this worth the expense and extra work? Can I get away
>with running a TH7DXX (have one on hand) at 37' to run the east coast while
>running the C31XR at Japan? Am I dreaming here with two different tribanders
>spread only 17' in height? Will it honestly make a difference in my contest
>scores (CQP, NAQP, NA Sprint, Sweepstakes)?
>
>Thanks for your thoughts,
>
>Tim, N6WIN.
>_______________________________________________
>SCCC mailing list
>SCCC at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
More information about the SCCC
mailing list