[SCCC] N1MM Logger vs. Win-TEST

[Dennis Younker NE6I]

Can't speak to Win-TEST, and frankly, didn't use the DOS based programs (I 
am a late bloomer). I used CQPwin for years and was plenty happy with it. 
Tried N1MM during CQP this year and found it to be an easy migration from 
CQPwin. I had heard that it was overwhelming but personally, I found it easy 
to use. I plan to use it in all of this season's contests.

I will be interested to hear others thoughts too.

--Dennis


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Horn" <bhorn at hornucopia.com>
To: "SCCC Reflector" <sccc at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:24 PM
Subject: [SCCC] N1MM Logger vs. Win-TEST


> Having purchased a new computer to support contesting, I need to decide 
> what Windows-based contest logging software to use. I've historically used 
> the DOS-based CT and then NA programs for single op CW and SSB contesting. 
> Besides the fact that one is free and the other isn't, do SCCCers feel 
> strongly about N1MM Logger vs. Win-TEST and if so, why?
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM   (bhorn at hornucopia.com)
> _______________________________________________
> SCCC mailing list
> SCCC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
>