[SCCC] N1MM Logger vs. Win-TEST

[Dennis Vernacchia]

One sure thing about N1MM - U get what you paid for. 

;-)

N6KI


Sent from my stinking I Phone 

On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Vic <ki6vc at verizon.net> wrote:

> I'll have to give my vote for N1MM.  The support is super and you can't beat the cost.  Runs well on Win7 and covers just about any contest you could want.  It offers a host of super gizwacky features or you can reduce it to single entry window.  Every problem I've encountered was solved reading the manual (all 379 pages!!)  N1MM is not for general logging...Tom sez it in the manual...but even that can be overcome.  CT and NA were great in their day and I've had a bear of time weening some off them and into 'MM but hey time to give up the stone ax and bearskins and move on.
> As for Win-Test, I haven't heard anything bad!
> 
> 
> 73 KI6VC Meko&Sparky
> 
> RF cures Global Warming...Save the world
> CONTEST MORE
> 
> Oct 25, 2010 08:34:46 PM, bhorn at hornucopia.com wrote:
> 
> Having purchased a new computer to support contesting, I need to decide what Windows-based contest logging software to use. I've historically used the DOS-based CT and then NA programs for single op CW and SSB contesting. Besides the fact that one is free and the other isn't, do SCCCers feel strongly about N1MM Logger vs. Win-TEST and if so, why?
> 
> Thanks for the advice.
> 
> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn at hornucopia.com)
> _______________________________________________
> SCCC mailing list
> SCCC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
> _______________________________________________
> SCCC mailing list
> SCCC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc