[SCCC] WPX CW question

[Kate Hutton]

Just quit early as it looked like the conditions were taking another dive.
 44 Q's.  Next time I will get the computer connected to the rig - that
should make some of the logging a little easier.

I didn't actually see an option to submit a "check log" in this contest.
 I've no shyness about finishing last, though.  HI HI.  At least some of the
ops I contacted will get credit ... most if an error of 1 is allowed to
squeak by.

Hank, one of my code practice exercises is to try to copy PAN.  Have I maybe
heard you there?

73 Kate K6HTN



On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Hank Garretson <w6sx at arrl.net> wrote:

> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I <ne6i at cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> I would think that where you sent the wrong number, the other station will
> > lose the QSO because the number he logged is not the number you logged.
> > This
> > would be true even if you mark your log as a check log.
> >
>
>
> I have been told by more than one usually reliable source that log-checking
> software allows one to be off by one number. Presumably to allow for the
> all-too-frequent QLF moments we all have with logging software. Don't know
> how true it is and don't know how universally it might be applied by
> various
> contests.
>
> 73,
>
> Hank
>
> Mammoth Lakes, California
>
> Elevation 8083 feet in John Muir's Range of Light
> _______________________________________________
> SCCC mailing list
> SCCC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
>