[SECC] Tie-breaker

[n4uk@mindspring.com]

 I third the motion on the tie breaker proposal.
John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> The proposal by K4OGG of a tie-breaker procedure is OK with me.  73, John,
K4BAI.

Jay Pryor wrote:

> The possibility exists that we could have a tie for one or more of the
> spots for the SECC nomination for WRTC-2002.  Here's what I propose for a
> tie-breaker:
>
> If there is a tie, we will have a vote of the current president, vp and
> secretary; plus the elected president, vp and secretary.  You will note
> that this is six positions.  However, since K9AY is the current secretary
> and also the president-elect, and we will let Gary have only one vote, we
> will have five votes to be cast.  Tie-breakers would be:  K4OGG; K2UFT;
> K9AY; K4NO; and AA4LR.
>
> Of course, we don't know if this will be necessary, but I want to have a
> procedure in place in case it is needed.
>
> Is this OK with club members?
>
> - Jay, K4OGG
>
> --
> SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
> Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com



--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com