[SECC] GQP-2004

Jeff w4dd at arrl.net
Wed Aug 13 19:31:01 EDT 2003


Perhaps voting on line for future issues is the answer.  Seems like the
hamfest attendance is too thin.

Jeff,
W4DD

-----Original Message-----
From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Jeff Clarke
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:31 PM
To: secc at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP-2004


I agree 100% with Ed...   This and other issues concerning GQP were hashed
over at
the meeting. In the end the majority ruled. It would be nice if we had more
meetings
per year so these issues could be decided by
all. Since I have been down here (13 months) I remember only 2 SECC
meetings. Both at
the Atlanta
Hamfest...

                Jeff

=========================================================
Jeffrey D. Clarke 706-628-9672 email : ku8e at bellsouth.net
=========================================================

----- Original Message -----
From: "K4SB" <k4sb at earthlink.net>
To: <secc at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [SECC] GQP-2004


> Tom Drake wrote:
> > Maybe it's time for a re-vote
> ---------------------
> This matter was voted on and passed by an overwhelming majority. I see
> no reason to continually argue about this matter.
>
> 73
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc

_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc



More information about the SECC mailing list