[SECC] Locals worked - 160 test
ku8e at bellsouth.net
ku8e at bellsouth.net
Mon Dec 8 15:37:44 EST 2003
Wouldn't it mostly eliminate those in TN , who are all in the TCG now anyway ??
We want to move it to the south and maybe east - but not too far east becuase
we want K4NO and others around the Huntsville area. As far as I know we have
no active members in TN or Western NC ??? We also want to make sure we don't lose anyone in SC....
Jeff
>
> From: Bill Coleman <aa4lr at arrl.net>
> Date: 2003/12/08 Mon AM 08:25:03 EST
> To: "Hal Kennedy" <halken at comcast.net>, "SECC" <secc at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [SECC] Locals worked - 160 test
>
> On 12/7/03 8:47 PM, Hal Kennedy at halken at comcast.net wrote:
>
> >I don't know when SECC last looked at their circle, but some clubs move
> >theirs fairly often - something to consider.
>
> The basic problem is, we have members at each edge of the circle. Moving
> it would mean excluding someone.
>
> K4SB did some analysis a couple of years ago, looking at this very issue.
> There appeared to be no advantage to moving the circle -- it would
> eliminate as many as it would include.
>
>
>
> Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net
> Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
> -- Wilbur Wright, 1901
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
More information about the SECC
mailing list