[SECC] W4AN on CQ cover

[Jay Pryor]

Speaking of plaques . . .

How's the GQP coming?  Any winners?

73,

Jay, K4OGG


At 09:15 AM 9/23/2004, ku8e at bellsouth.net wrote:
>I think the ARRL contests are run much better than CQ. They are timely 
>with the results and mailing you your plaques/certificates. Plus they 
>publish the results online for everyone to see.
>
>It usually takes at least 3 years to get anything from CQ. Plus they refuse to
>publish the results online because they want you to buy their magazine. 
>Their plaques and certificates seem to be a lower quality of what the ARRL has.
>
>Just my observation.....
>
>
>                        73, Jeff
>
> >
> > From: "Courtney Judd - K4WI" <k4wi at earthlink.net>
> > Date: 2004/09/22 Wed PM 07:20:12 EDT
> > To: "David Thompson" <thompson at mindspring.com>
> > CC: SECC <secc at contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: [SECC] W4AN on CQ cover
> >
> > I agree with you Dave 100%... CQWW is unlike any other and I support CQ
> > 100%. If I had to pick between CQ and QST it would be CQ hands down..
> > entered my first rtty contest last year and brought home a first place SO
> > USA 10 mtrs in CQ rtty WPX 2004 qualified for a plaque but no sponsers but
> > tickle me pink! 73's Cort K4WI
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>SECC mailing list
>SECC at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc