[SECC] CW Sweepstakes Final Update - All Members
Kt4zb at aol.com
Kt4zb at aol.com
Thu Nov 4 07:26:06 PDT 2010
Hi all - Our officers have done a great job in planning ways to increase
activity in the club and on the reflector, so I echo Ralph's plea. Jump in
and add your name to the list and have fun in this great hobby. While I'm
not a cw kinda guy, I am planning on bringing along a couple of newer
contesters to run a Multi-Single in SSB SS. Great contest and completely
different from last weeks CQWW. I know I owe a great deal to SECC for helping
me develop skills and a station.
Good hunting - Jere, KT4ZB
In a message dated 11/4/2010 9:08:58 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
k1zzi at comcast.net writes:
SECC Members,
Six (6) award plaques are sponsored and only 7 people have committed to
show up for Sweepstakes CW. Your officers have tried to put together a nice
internal awards program to stimulate participation, however, it has had
little positive effect.
The officers have discussed participation issues since day one, however, I’
m sorry to say that it appears that you want simply a place to post your
scores and little more than that from your club. We have 231 members, yet
our contest participation levels are consistently below 6%. We have asked
you for ideas/suggestions for the direction you want to see the SECC take,
but even that has yielded very few responses. Tommy W4BQF asked what you
wanted from your contest club and because of the lack of feedback, we can only
deduce that you want a place to post your scores and nothing more. We
share Tom's frustration in getting almost no feedback and little
participation from the membership.
We sincerely thank all the plaque sponsors that came forward to help us
and we are sorry that it did not provide the incentive that we had hoped for.
Ralph K1ZZI
SECC VP
----- Original Message -----
From: Ralph K1ZZI <_mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net_ (mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net)
<_mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net_ (mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net) > >
To: _secc at contesting.com_ (mip://05a12870/secc@contesting.com)
<_secc at contesting.com_ (mip://05a12870/secc@contesting.com) >
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:54 AM
Subject: Nov 6th CW Sweepstakes - Sponsor Update
We had a very good response from volunteers willing to sponsor plaques for
SSCW. Here are the categories and sponsors:
Rookie - Contesting 2 years or less - WB4MAK
SOLP Tribander / Wires 40-160 (no yagis) - W4IX
SOLP - K4BAI
SOHP - NA4BW
QRP - NT9K
Unlimited - K1ZZI
Award Eligibility:
* Signup - commit to contest and post score
* All SECC members in or out of Circle*
* Need minimum of 2 people competing per category
* Log 50 QSO's minimum
* Prior 2010 winners limited to one plaque annually
* SECC officers not eligible
*Unlike the NAQP contest, the club aggregate score cannot include OP's
from outside the SECC Circle for this contest,
however, we still want to provide award eligibility to all our club
members regardless of your location.
We will need at least 20 participants to support the investment of six
sponsors. Except for our sponsors there has been practically no response or
input received from anyone. Please reply by Nov 1st if you want to
participate. I will add you to the current big list of (2) contesters!
73,
Ralph K1ZZI
SECC VP
_k1zzi at comcast.net_ (mip://05a12870/k1zzi@comcast.net)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ralph K1ZZI <_mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net_ (mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net) >
To: _secc at contesting.com_ (mip://05a12870/secc@contesting.com)
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:58 AM
Subject: Nov 6th CW Sweepstakes - SECC Get Ready!
Nov 6th - 8th CW Sweepstakes
One of the favorite contest events of the year! SECC get ready to for some
fun competition.
One of our members suggested we setup teams for a little extra internal
fun. What do you think about that idea? Depending on the total number
interested we could have 4 or 5 people on a team.
Are you planning to participate in SS CW? Would you be interested in
joining a team? Let me know if you are and I will start a list. I would like
to get something going and make this a fun event for everyone. We are open
for ideas and I encourage discussion. We could blow the doors off this one
and win the ARRL Gavel? The SECC has won it before so we have the power.
It's all up to you. Sign up now!
Wait there's more: NA4BW, K4BAI, K1ZZI will sponsor one plaque each
for SOHP, SOLP and "Unlimited". How about plaques for QRP, Multi-Op? Or can
you think of another category of interest? Oops we will need more
sponsors! No club dues / nothing in the treasury. If you are interested in
sponsoring a plaque for a particular category just let me know. Plaques are $20
each and they are very nice, first class. Same as our NAQP and GQP plaques.
Ralph K1ZZI
SECC VP
_k1zzi at comcast.net_ (mip://05a12870/k1zzi@comcast.net)
____________________________________
Complete ARRL SS Rules here:
_http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Packets/2010%20ARRL%20November%20Sweepstakes%20Package.pdf_
(http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Packets/2010%20ARRL%20November%20Sweepstakes%20Package
.pdf) <_http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest_
(http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest) Packets/2010 ARRL November Sweepstakes Package.pdf>
<_http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest_
(http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest) Packets/2010 ARRL November Sweepstakes Package.pdf>
----- Original Message -----
From: _Ralph K1ZZI_ (mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net)
To: _secc at contesting.com_ (mailto:secc at contesting.com)
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:43 PM
Subject: [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes Contest Overview & Tips
This is an informative article written by John, K3TN on ARRL Sweepstakes
Contesting. A good read for all experience levels and some excellent
tips to help get you started!!
73, Ralph K1ZZI
History
The ARRL Sweepstakes has its roots in “The January Contest” announced in
December 1929 QST. It was originally structured as a message handling
contest for hams in Canada and the US (which at the time included Cuba, the
Philippines and “Porto Rico”) and ran for two solid weeks in January. A
successful two way exchange of a minimum ten word message would result in two
points for each station. The number of message points would be multiplied by
the number of ARRL sections at the time (68) for the final score. A key rule
was “Participating stations will be limited for the purposes of the
contest to sending but one test message to each station worked; that is, further
messages can be transmitted but will not add to the contest score of either
station.” Thus was born the dreaded “work stations once per band” rule.
While a lot about the contest has stayed the same over the years, much has
also changed. Sweepstakes was moved to November in 1932; a separate phone
contest was added in 1941; and operating time was limited to 24 hours along
the way. However, for the past half-century not much has changed, other
than the ARRL section list gradually expanding to its current level of 80.
Description and Rules Summary
The ARRL Sweepstakes consists of two contests, one for phone and one for
CW, that are open to US and Canadian hams only. A summary of the important
rules:
Contest Period:
CW: First full weekend in November
Phone: Third full weekend in November
Operating Period – 24 of the 30 hours from 2100Z Saturday to 0300Z Sunday
Exchange – Serial Number; Precedence; Your Call; Check; Section
Where: Precedence = Q (5 watts output or less), A (under 150w), B (above
150w), U (Single Op Unlimited), M (Multiop), or S (school station)
Check = last two digits of the first year of license of the operator or
station
Section – ARRL/RAC section location of the station. List of standard
section abbreviations is _here_ (http://www.arrl.org/contests/sections.abv.html)
Duplicate Contacts – stations can only be worked once per band.
The full rules can be found _here_
(http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2009/novss.html) . For any given year substitute the current year for “2009”
in that URL.
Strategies
Like any contest, selecting the best strategy for Sweepstakes depends on
your goals. You can play to win in one of many categories or in your
section, just help out your local club’s score, try to fill in the states you need
for 5BWAS or just try to see how quickly you can make a Clean Sweep. As
long as your strategy matches your goal, you are bound to have fun.
Whatever your goal is, scoring more points is always more fun. Maximizing
score per hour means the most fun per unit time invested. Look _here_
(http://wiki.contesting.com/index.php/Wisdom_from_CQ-Contest#Secrets_of_Operating_S
weepstakes.2C_mostly_by_N6TR) for some great operating tips on maximizing
your SS score.
Equipment
Station design is always an important starting point. Sweepstakes is a
very “little gun” friendly contest and doesn’t require huge antenna farms
Since SS is a domestic contest, low antennas in many cases are preferable.
N6BV has some excellent pointers on optimizing your antenna choices for SS –
click _here_ (http://www.kkn.net/dayton2006/N6BV-Dayton-2006.pdf) . In low
sunspot years, forty and eighty meters are the “money bands” in Sweepstakes,
with 20 meters being the usual workhorse. Near sunspot peaks, 15 and 10
meters provide wide open spaces for more QSOs.
Sweepstakes doesn’t have any unique demands on other aspects of station
design, though the “work once per band” rule does give a lot of benefit to
having a second radio. Run rates on Sunday often slow down to glacial speed
(especially CW SS), and having a second radio to search and pounce between
automated CQs brings in a lot of extra QSOs.
If you aren’t planning an extensive effort, you can still get paper forms
_here_ (http://www.arrl.org/contests/forms/novsslog.pdf) and log by hand.
However, logging contests real time on a computer is just so much more
efficient – and green. Just about every popular contest logging program
supports SS – check _Contest logging software_
(http://wiki.contesting.com/index.php/Contest_logging_software) . If you aren’t going to use a computer to send
CW, the long exchange in SS means at least using a memory keyer with an
incrementing serial number capability, to maintain your sanity.
Operating Time
There are all kinds of theories on strategies for selecting the optimal
operating time periods for SS, but like all contests more hours in the chair
will always translate to more points. In general, if you are going to put
more than 12 hours or so into SS being on from the start for the first 8-10
hours is key to getting that QSO total up. If you can only put in a few
hours, calling CQ on Sunday afternoon will bring some nice high run rates
since you will be fresh meat to all the stations putting in full time efforts.
If your goal is to maximize points for your club, a common strategy is to
operate from one station on Saturday and then from another station (with
that station’s call) on Sunday – basically combining both of the above
strategies.
Common wisdom in Sweepstakes is to let the multipliers come to you –
unless your goal is to just get a Clean Sweep, the best strategy is to maximize
QSOs. For a 100,000 point SS effort, a multiplier is worth about 8 QSOs -
spending more than 10 or 15 minutes to get that elusive section will
basically lower your score. But if you just want that Clean Sweep mug, knowing
propagation paths from your location is the secret sauce: what times/bands
will give you the short hops to nearby sections and which will provide
openings to the Pacific or quasi-polar distant sections. Barring entering the
unlimited category and using packet spotting, working the rare sections that don
’t have a lot of operators is pretty much just luck of the draw.
As in any contest, maximizing score means running (calling CQ) as much as
possible, and SS is one of the easier contests for the average station to
find and hold a CQ frequency. However, if you did a lot of running on
Saturday, searching and pouncing on Sunday to find those “Sunday drivers” will
be important.
Sweepstakes Etiquette
Sweepstakes is a contest that attracts the full spectrum of hams: top
operators at big stations looking to win, serious contesters looking to beat
last year's score or come in ahead of their buddies, club members just
looking to help the club score, and first time contesters just trying this thing
out. Just like in a marathon running race, that means there are competitors
at a wide level of capabilities. To deal with that there are some norms of
“etiquette” that have evolved to let everyone have the most possible
amount of fun. These are not hard and fast rules, just common norms that have
evolved over the years. You won’t be disqualified by going against any of
these norms, but by following them you will definitely save a lot of whining
on CQ-CONTEST after SS is over.
There many areas where standard contest etiquette applies, but there are
also some specific norms for SS:
* The exchange in Sweepstakes is complicated on purpose –
Sweepstakes tradition comes from traffic handling - this is what makes SS fun and
different. Learn the exchange before the contest and get comfortable sending
and receiving it in the expected order. There are basically three scenarios
to be comfortable with:
1. The CQ Scenario: You will either be calling CQ or answering CQs
and following a standard protocol will make everything go faster and more
smoothly:
K3TN: CQ SS K3TN K3TN SS
W8ABC: W8ABC
K3TN: W8ABC 123 B K3TN 69 MDC
W8ABC: 55 A W8ABC 74 OH
K3TN: TU K3TN SS
Remember, SS is one of those contests where you do not have to send RS(T).
When you send the exchange the first time, no need to send anything twice –
send it once and let the other station ask for a fill if needed. Also,
there is no need to send “NR” at the start of your exchange when replying to
a CQ, though some feel it helps the receiving station get ready to copy
the exchange.
Note: Sweepstakes does not require that the station answering the CQ send
back the CQers call. It is not a bad idea to do so if you think there is
any doubt who you (W8ABC above) are responding to, such as on a crowded band
where multiple CQers are “sharing” a frequency. In that case, W8ABC would
reply “K3TN 55 A W8ABC 74 OH”
2. The Fill scenario: Contests are about speed and accuracy, so
before you hit enter in the log you want to make sure you have the info right.
Good operators will always ask for a repeat or “fill” if they missed part
of the exchange or aren’t 100% certain they copied it right. The generally
accepted ways to ask for fills are:
CK? – Please send the Check (last two digits of the first year you were
licensed) again
NR? – Please send the serial number again.
PREC? – Please send the Precedence (A, B, M, U, S, Q) again.
SEC? – Please send your Section again.
CL? – Please repeat your call?
AGN or ? – Please resend the entire exchange again.
It is only really necessary to send the entire exchange if the station
sends AGN or ? but many operators aren’t familiar with the abbreviations for
Check and Precedence and so on.
K3TN: CQ SS K3TN K3TN SS
W8ABC: W8ABC
K3TN: W8ABC 1%& B K3TN 69 MDC
W8ABC: NR?
K3TN: 123
W8ABC: 55 A W8ABC 74 OH
K3TN: TU K3TN SS
If there appears to be any confusion, just resend the entire exchange.
3. The Dupe Scenario: This is a tricky one. When you are calling CQ
and a station calls you that you have already worked, in most contests it is
just faster to work them a second time. However, the long exchange in SS
changes that equation a bit – many stations choose to not work dupes and
will send “K3TN B4” or “K3TN QSO B4” or “K3TN DUPE.” This may or may not be
the right thing to do, depending on circumstances. N6TR (who manages the
log-checking for SS) has made it clear that a repeat QSO in one log that is
a first QSO in another will not result in a penalty to either op. On the
other hand, a NIL (not-in-log) QSO, where a QSO shown in one log is not even
loosely matched in another log, will result in a fairly significant
penalty. On Saturday evening, when rates are high, it may make sense to say "QSO
B4" and go on to the next station, because if you are not in his log,
chances are good that the station will call you again on Sunday. On Sunday, when
rates are low and "fresh meat" is scarce, it makes sense to insist that
the previous QSO is "not in my log" and say "pse work again". You're really
doing the other station a favor, and not costing either of you much precious
time.
* Send the entire exchange! - don't forget, you must send your
callsign as part of the exchange.
* Cut numbers and leading zeroes: In contests where RST is required,
sending 5NN is universally recognized to mean 599 – just as CW is
universally recognized as an abbreviation for Continuous Wave. However, in SS using
cut numbers in the CK field (6N instead of 69) or even in the serial
number field leads to confusion because of the mix of numbers and letters in the
exchange. Just avoid cut numbers. Similarly, there is no reason to send
leading zeroes – they just increase the chance for confusion.
* Use the standard abbreviations for sections on CW and standard
phonetics on SSB. In Sweepstakes, you are not in “Maryland” or “Massachusetts,
” you are in “Maryland DC (MDC on CW)” or “Eastern Mass (EMA on CW)" or
wherever. You can find the list of standard ARRL sections _here_
(http://www.arrl.org/contests/sections.abv.html) . Similarly, leave the fun phonetics
on the shelf for contests – stick with the ICAO standard phonetics found
_here_ (http://www.emcomm.org/svares/training/itu_phonetics_10_30_2001.htm) .
* Send (or say) the exchange in the standard order: number,
precedence, your call, your check and your section. There's no need to say
"precedence", "check" or "section" if they are in sequence, making it faster and
clearer both for you and for the other station. In general, the fewer words
the better.
* Don’t repeat what you copied back to the CQer. Especially on SSB,
it is tempting to say “Thanks for number 123 B in MDC, you are number …”
Just stick to sending your information and everything will move along more
quickly.
* Send “QRL?” or “?” twice to check if a frequency is in use. The
long SS exchange also means that there will be longer than usual gaps while
a CQer is listening to someone reply. Just sending “dit dit” and then
hitting that CQ key is just rude – do the right thing and check twice. If you
are running stations and don’t respond to QRL? checks, the frequency is
assumed to be up for grabs. A corollary to this principle is…
* Just because you own two radios doesn’t mean you own two
frequencies. If you are operating SO2R and don’t respond to a legitimate “double
QRL?” because you were off on the other radio trying to break the VE8 pileup,
that frequency is up for grabs.
* Send CW at the code speed of the other operator, or the fastest
you are comfortable copying – whichever is lower. If you answer someone CQing
at 35 wpm, but are only able to copy 20 wpm, reply at 20 wpm. If you are
sending CQ at 35 wpm and someone responds at 20 wpm, slooow down to
something near the other station’s code speed. Hitting Page Down or twisting the
K1EL knob a bit isn't that hard. Exceptions: on Sunday, everyone slows down
their CQ code speed to attract casual operators. Also, if you hear a buddy
calling CQ at 20 wpm and you know they can copy 35 wpm, call them at the
higher speed. Even more fun: call him or her at 45 wpm and throw in some cut
numbers: "ATN B K3TN 6N MDC" Remember: only do this out of love.
_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20101104/71028395/attachment-0001.html
More information about the SECC
mailing list