[SECC] CW Sweepstakes Final Update - All Members
N4YT
bob at n4yt.com
Thu Nov 4 18:11:42 PDT 2010
Well said Greg. I think you hit the nail on the head. I too really enjoy the club but like you I have a small low power station so we are not as competitive as we would like to be.
The officers and club elders if you will are doing a great job
Bob
N4YT
On Nov 4, 2010, at 20:50, "Greg Potter" <gregpotter at charter.net> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am not sure how to say this exactly. It is always dangerous because my fingers sometimes move faster than my brains.
>
> Let's start by saying that I THINK THE CLUB OFFICERS ARE DOING A GREAT JOB and this is a super contest club. Joining the SECC is one of the best moves I ever made in ham radio. It is pure fun and the friendly, but sometime intense competition is invigorating! (Several club members beat me out in this last contest...:) & every preceeding one)
>
> Now on the subject of plaques. I am sometimes embarassed by some of the really nice looking hardware that gets handed out. The fact is that not all of us have a lot of money floating around these days. Many are retired or approaching retirement and with the way the country has appeared to be heading, things have been just too uncertain around here for some folks to be able to sponsor plaques.
>
> I love the competition and the sheer fun of contesting. The plaques are beautiful, but I just like seeing my call come up in the totals and knowing I made a contribution to the club score and that I didn't do too bad for a beamless, ampless puny peanut whistle station. I recently received a very nice packet of GA QSO party certificates for my mobile operation in GQP. It was really nice, but I was a little embarrassed to think that someone had to spend all that time on them and then pay to mail them to me. All that aside, there is still nothing better than one of the veteran superstars taking a minute to send a "nice score" email if it is warranted.
>
> Participation will pick up. My humble opinion is that quite a few folks will not committ because they don't want to make committments they are not 100% sure they can keep. Life keeps getting in the way. Maybe some "part time accolades" are something to think about for folks that just cannot commit to a full contest.
>
> I would hope that all of our current club officers know they are doing just fine! WE LOVE THE CLUB AND WE LOVE THE JOB YOU ALL ARE DOING! Keep putting out those totals, post them where they can be seen and then sit back and relax until the next contest starts. Take it easy and have some fun. I applaud your efforts and the dedication of those willing to donate plaques, but my gut feeling is most folks are just having fun.
>
> Oh one last thing. When a chance to compete with another club presents itself, it certainly gets my blood stirring. That NAQP gig was a real hoot!
>
> Thanks folks!
>
> 73 de Greg NM2L
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ralph K1ZZI
> Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:09 AM
> To: secc at contesting.com
> Cc: NA4bw at bellsouth.net
> Subject: [SECC] CW Sweepstakes Final Update - All Members
>
> SECC Members,
>
> Six (6) award plaques are sponsored and only 7 people have committed to show up for Sweepstakes CW. Your officers have tried to put together a nice internal awards program to stimulate participation, however, it has had little positive effect.
>
> The officers have discussed participation issues since day one, however, I’m sorry to say that it appears that you want simply a place to post your scores and little more than that from your club. We have 231 members, yet our contest participation levels are consistently below 6%. We have asked you for ideas/suggestions for the direction you want to see the SECC take, but even that has yielded very few responses. Tommy W4BQF asked what you wanted from your contest club and because of the lack of feedback, we can only deduce that you want a place to post your scores and nothing more. We share Tom's frustration in getting almost no feedback and little participation from the membership.
>
> We sincerely thank all the plaque sponsors that came forward to help us and we are sorry that it did not provide the incentive that we had hoped for.
>
> Ralph K1ZZI
> SECC VP
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ralph K1ZZI <mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net <mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net> >
> To: secc at contesting.com <secc at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:54 AM
> Subject: Nov 6th CW Sweepstakes - Sponsor Update
>
> We had a very good response from volunteers willing to sponsor plaques for SSCW. Here are the categories and sponsors:
>
> Rookie - Contesting 2 years or less - WB4MAK
> SOLP Tribander / Wires 40-160 (no yagis) - W4IX
> SOLP - K4BAI
> SOHP - NA4BW
> QRP - NT9K
> Unlimited - K1ZZI
>
> Award Eligibility:
> Signup - commit to contest and post score
> All SECC members in or out of Circle*
> Need minimum of 2 people competing per category
> Log 50 QSO's minimum
> Prior 2010 winners limited to one plaque annually
> SECC officers not eligible
> *Unlike the NAQP contest, the club aggregate score cannot include OP's from outside the SECC Circle for this contest,
> however, we still want to provide award eligibility to all our club members regardless of your location.
>
> We will need at least 20 participants to support the investment of six sponsors. Except for our sponsors there has been practically no response or input received from anyone. Please reply by Nov 1st if you want to participate. I will add you to the current big list of (2) contesters!
>
> 73,
> Ralph K1ZZI
> SECC VP
> k1zzi at comcast.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ralph K1ZZI <mailto:k1zzi at comcast.net>
> To: secc at contesting.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:58 AM
> Subject: Nov 6th CW Sweepstakes - SECC Get Ready!
> Nov 6th - 8th CW Sweepstakes
>
>
>
> One of the favorite contest events of the year! SECC get ready to for some fun competition.
>
> One of our members suggested we setup teams for a little extra internal fun. What do you think about that idea? Depending on the total number interested we could have 4 or 5 people on a team.
>
> Are you planning to participate in SS CW? Would you be interested in joining a team? Let me know if you are and I will start a list. I would like to get something going and make this a fun event for everyone. We are open for ideas and I encourage discussion. We could blow the doors off this one and win the ARRL Gavel? The SECC has won it before so we have the power. It's all up to you. Sign up now!
>
> Wait there's more: NA4BW, K4BAI, K1ZZI will sponsor one plaque each for SOHP, SOLP and "Unlimited". How about plaques for QRP, Multi-Op? Or can you think of another category of interest? Oops we will need more sponsors! No club dues / nothing in the treasury. If you are interested in sponsoring a plaque for a particular category just let me know. Plaques are $20 each and they are very nice, first class. Same as our NAQP and GQP plaques.
>
> Ralph K1ZZI
> SECC VP
> k1zzi at comcast.net
>
>
> Complete ARRL SS Rules here: http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Packets/2010%20ARRL%20November%20Sweepstakes%20Package.pdf <http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest Packets/2010 ARRL November Sweepstakes Package.pdf> <http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest Packets/2010 ARRL November Sweepstakes Package.pdf>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ralph K1ZZI
> To: secc at contesting.com
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:43 PM
> Subject: [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes Contest Overview & Tips
>
> This is an informative article written by John, K3TN on ARRL Sweepstakes Contesting. A good read for all experience levels and some excellent tips to help get you started!!
>
> 73, Ralph K1ZZI
>
> History
>
> The ARRL Sweepstakes has its roots in “The January Contest” announced in December 1929 QST. It was originally structured as a message handling contest for hams in Canada and the US (which at the time included Cuba, the Philippines and “Porto Rico”) and ran for two solid weeks in January. A successful two way exchange of a minimum ten word message would result in two points for each station. The number of message points would be multiplied by the number of ARRL sections at the time (68) for the final score. A key rule was “Participating stations will be limited for the purposes of the contest to sending but one test message to each station worked; that is, further messages can be transmitted but will not add to the contest score of either station.” Thus was born the dreaded “work stations once per band” rule.
>
> While a lot about the contest has stayed the same over the years, much has also changed. Sweepstakes was moved to November in 1932; a separate phone contest was added in 1941; and operating time was limited to 24 hours along the way. However, for the past half-century not much has changed, other than the ARRL section list gradually expanding to its current level of 80.
>
> Description and Rules Summary
> The ARRL Sweepstakes consists of two contests, one for phone and one for CW, that are open to US and Canadian hams only. A summary of the important rules:
>
> Contest Period:
> CW: First full weekend in November
> Phone: Third full weekend in November
> Operating Period – 24 of the 30 hours from 2100Z Saturday to 0300Z Sunday
> Exchange – Serial Number; Precedence; Your Call; Check; Section
>
> Where: Precedence = Q (5 watts output or less), A (under 150w), B (above 150w), U (Single Op Unlimited), M (Multiop), or S (school station)
>
> Check = last two digits of the first year of license of the operator or station
>
> Section – ARRL/RAC section location of the station. List of standard section abbreviations is here
>
> Duplicate Contacts – stations can only be worked once per band.
>
> The full rules can be found here. For any given year substitute the current year for “2009” in that URL.
>
> Strategies
> Like any contest, selecting the best strategy for Sweepstakes depends on your goals. You can play to win in one of many categories or in your section, just help out your local club’s score, try to fill in the states you need for 5BWAS or just try to see how quickly you can make a Clean Sweep. As long as your strategy matches your goal, you are bound to have fun.
> Whatever your goal is, scoring more points is always more fun. Maximizing score per hour means the most fun per unit time invested. Look here for some great operating tips on maximizing your SS score.
>
> Equipment
> Station design is always an important starting point. Sweepstakes is a very “little gun” friendly contest and doesn’t require huge antenna farms Since SS is a domestic contest, low antennas in many cases are preferable. N6BV has some excellent pointers on optimizing your antenna choices for SS – click here. In low sunspot years, forty and eighty meters are the “money bands” in Sweepstakes, with 20 meters being the usual workhorse. Near sunspot peaks, 15 and 10 meters provide wide open spaces for more QSOs.
> Sweepstakes doesn’t have any unique demands on other aspects of station design, though the “work once per band” rule does give a lot of benefit to having a second radio. Run rates on Sunday often slow down to glacial speed (especially CW SS), and having a second radio to search and pounce between automated CQs brings in a lot of extra QSOs.
>
> If you aren’t planning an extensive effort, you can still get paper forms here and log by hand. However, logging contests real time on a computer is just so much more efficient – and green. Just about every popular contest logging program supports SS – check Contest logging software. If you aren’t going to use a computer to send CW, the long exchange in SS means at least using a memory keyer with an incrementing serial number capability, to maintain your sanity.
>
> Operating Time
> There are all kinds of theories on strategies for selecting the optimal operating time periods for SS, but like all contests more hours in the chair will always translate to more points. In general, if you are going to put more than 12 hours or so into SS being on from the start for the first 8-10 hours is key to getting that QSO total up. If you can only put in a few hours, calling CQ on Sunday afternoon will bring some nice high run rates since you will be fresh meat to all the stations putting in full time efforts. If your goal is to maximize points for your club, a common strategy is to operate from one station on Saturday and then from another station (with that station’s call) on Sunday – basically combining both of the above strategies.
> Common wisdom in Sweepstakes is to let the multipliers come to you – unless your goal is to just get a Clean Sweep, the best strategy is to maximize QSOs. For a 100,000 point SS effort, a multiplier is worth about 8 QSOs - spending more than 10 or 15 minutes to get that elusive section will basically lower your score. But if you just want that Clean Sweep mug, knowing propagation paths from your location is the secret sauce: what times/bands will give you the short hops to nearby sections and which will provide openings to the Pacific or quasi-polar distant sections. Barring entering the unlimited category and using packet spotting, working the rare sections that don’t have a lot of operators is pretty much just luck of the draw.
>
> As in any contest, maximizing score means running (calling CQ) as much as possible, and SS is one of the easier contests for the average station to find and hold a CQ frequency. However, if you did a lot of running on Saturday, searching and pouncing on Sunday to find those “Sunday drivers” will be important.
>
> Sweepstakes Etiquette
> Sweepstakes is a contest that attracts the full spectrum of hams: top operators at big stations looking to win, serious contesters looking to beat last year's score or come in ahead of their buddies, club members just looking to help the club score, and first time contesters just trying this thing out. Just like in a marathon running race, that means there are competitors at a wide level of capabilities. To deal with that there are some norms of “etiquette” that have evolved to let everyone have the most possible amount of fun. These are not hard and fast rules, just common norms that have evolved over the years. You won’t be disqualified by going against any of these norms, but by following them you will definitely save a lot of whining on CQ-CONTEST after SS is over.
> There many areas where standard contest etiquette applies, but there are also some specific norms for SS:
>
> The exchange in Sweepstakes is complicated on purpose – Sweepstakes tradition comes from traffic handling - this is what makes SS fun and different. Learn the exchange before the contest and get comfortable sending and receiving it in the expected order. There are basically three scenarios to be comfortable with:
> The CQ Scenario: You will either be calling CQ or answering CQs and following a standard protocol will make everything go faster and more smoothly:
>
> K3TN: CQ SS K3TN K3TN SS
> W8ABC: W8ABC
> K3TN: W8ABC 123 B K3TN 69 MDC
> W8ABC: 55 A W8ABC 74 OH
> K3TN: TU K3TN SS
>
> Remember, SS is one of those contests where you do not have to send RS(T). When you send the exchange the first time, no need to send anything twice – send it once and let the other station ask for a fill if needed. Also, there is no need to send “NR” at the start of your exchange when replying to a CQ, though some feel it helps the receiving station get ready to copy the exchange.
>
> Note: Sweepstakes does not require that the station answering the CQ send back the CQers call. It is not a bad idea to do so if you think there is any doubt who you (W8ABC above) are responding to, such as on a crowded band where multiple CQers are “sharing” a frequency. In that case, W8ABC would reply “K3TN 55 A W8ABC 74 OH”
> The Fill scenario: Contests are about speed and accuracy, so before you hit enter in the log you want to make sure you have the info right. Good operators will always ask for a repeat or “fill” if they missed part of the exchange or aren’t 100% certain they copied it right. The generally accepted ways to ask for fills are:
>
> CK? – Please send the Check (last two digits of the first year you were licensed) again
> NR? – Please send the serial number again.
> PREC? – Please send the Precedence (A, B, M, U, S, Q) again.
> SEC? – Please send your Section again.
> CL? – Please repeat your call?
> AGN or ? – Please resend the entire exchange again.
>
> It is only really necessary to send the entire exchange if the station sends AGN or ? but many operators aren’t familiar with the abbreviations for Check and Precedence and so on.
>
> K3TN: CQ SS K3TN K3TN SS
> W8ABC: W8ABC
> K3TN: W8ABC 1%& B K3TN 69 MDC
> W8ABC: NR?
> K3TN: 123
> W8ABC: 55 A W8ABC 74 OH
> K3TN: TU K3TN SS
>
> If there appears to be any confusion, just resend the entire exchange.
> The Dupe Scenario: This is a tricky one. When you are calling CQ and a station calls you that you have already worked, in most contests it is just faster to work them a second time. However, the long exchange in SS changes that equation a bit – many stations choose to not work dupes and will send “K3TN B4” or “K3TN QSO B4” or “K3TN DUPE.” This may or may not be the right thing to do, depending on circumstances. N6TR (who manages the log-checking for SS) has made it clear that a repeat QSO in one log that is a first QSO in another will not result in a penalty to either op. On the other hand, a NIL (not-in-log) QSO, where a QSO shown in one log is not even loosely matched in another log, will result in a fairly significant penalty. On Saturday evening, when rates are high, it may make sense to say "QSO B4" and go on to the next station, because if you are not in his log, chances are good that the station will call you again on Sunday. On Sunday, when rates are low and "fresh meat" is scarce, it makes sense to insist that the previous QSO is "not in my log" and say "pse work again". You're really doing the other station a favor, and not costing either of you much precious time.
> Send the entire exchange! - don't forget, you must send your callsign as part of the exchange.
> Cut numbers and leading zeroes: In contests where RST is required, sending 5NN is universally recognized to mean 599 – just as CW is universally recognized as an abbreviation for Continuous Wave. However, in SS using cut numbers in the CK field (6N instead of 69) or even in the serial number field leads to confusion because of the mix of numbers and letters in the exchange. Just avoid cut numbers. Similarly, there is no reason to send leading zeroes – they just increase the chance for confusion.
> Use the standard abbreviations for sections on CW and standard phonetics on SSB. In Sweepstakes, you are not in “Maryland” or “Massachusetts,” you are in “Maryland DC (MDC on CW)” or “Eastern Mass (EMA on CW)" or wherever. You can find the list of standard ARRL sections here. Similarly, leave the fun phonetics on the shelf for contests – stick with the ICAO standard phonetics found here.
> Send (or say) the exchange in the standard order: number, precedence, your call, your check and your section. There's no need to say "precedence", "check" or "section" if they are in sequence, making it faster and clearer both for you and for the other station. In general, the fewer words the better.
> Don’t repeat what you copied back to the CQer. Especially on SSB, it is tempting to say “Thanks for number 123 B in MDC, you are number …” Just stick to sending your information and everything will move along more quickly.
> Send “QRL?” or “?” twice to check if a frequency is in use. The long SS exchange also means that there will be longer than usual gaps while a CQer is listening to someone reply. Just sending “dit dit” and then hitting that CQ key is just rude – do the right thing and check twice. If you are running stations and don’t respond to QRL? checks, the frequency is assumed to be up for grabs. A corollary to this principle is…
> Just because you own two radios doesn’t mean you own two frequencies. If you are operating SO2R and don’t respond to a legitimate “double QRL?” because you were off on the other radio trying to break the VE8 pileup, that frequency is up for grabs.
> Send CW at the code speed of the other operator, or the fastest you are comfortable copying – whichever is lower. If you answer someone CQing at 35 wpm, but are only able to copy 20 wpm, reply at 20 wpm. If you are sending CQ at 35 wpm and someone responds at 20 wpm, slooow down to something near the other station’s code speed. Hitting Page Down or twisting the K1EL knob a bit isn't that hard. Exceptions: on Sunday, everyone slows down their CQ code speed to attract casual operators. Also, if you hear a buddy calling CQ at 20 wpm and you know they can copy 35 wpm, call them at the higher speed. Even more fun: call him or her at 45 wpm and throw in some cut numbers: "ATN B K3TN 6N MDC" Remember: only do this out of love.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20101104/90fc8ac0/attachment-0001.html
More information about the SECC
mailing list