[SECC] SS CW Activity Analysis

[Hal Kennedy]

Always been torn about the last hour.  I think a few late comers show up
then but I have spent a lot of time tuning and CQing for few QSOs with 30
minutes to go.
Opinions??

Hal N4GG

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Lee Hiers <lee.hiers at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Don...it sure shows why all the experts say avoid 160!
>
> CU in SS!
>
> AA4GA
>
> On Nov 3, 2017 3:44 PM, "Hal Kennedy" <halken at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks!!
>> N4GG
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Don Crain via SECC <secc at contesting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Attached is a document that I put together over
>>> a period of several years that shows number of
>>> QSO's by hour of the contest and by band.
>>>
>>> I have not updated it since the included 2014 data,
>>> but the trend will overall still remain the same, with
>>> some allowance for solar activity effect on propagation.
>>>
>>> 73 and have fun in the SS CW!
>>>
>>> Don W4OC
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SECC mailing list
>>> SECC at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SECC mailing list
>> SECC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20171103/b36c32fc/attachment.html>