[SECC] SS CW Activity Analysis

[Lee Hiers]

I've always seen a little bump the last hour....but it's usually only the
first 30 or 45 minutes.

On Nov 3, 2017 5:53 PM, "Hal Kennedy" <halken at comcast.net> wrote:

> Always been torn about the last hour.  I think a few late comers show up
> then but I have spent a lot of time tuning and CQing for few QSOs with 30
> minutes to go.
> Opinions??
>
> Hal N4GG
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Lee Hiers <lee.hiers at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Don...it sure shows why all the experts say avoid 160!
>>
>> CU in SS!
>>
>> AA4GA
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2017 3:44 PM, "Hal Kennedy" <halken at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks!!
>>> N4GG
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Don Crain via SECC <secc at contesting.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attached is a document that I put together over
>>>> a period of several years that shows number of
>>>> QSO's by hour of the contest and by band.
>>>>
>>>> I have not updated it since the included 2014 data,
>>>> but the trend will overall still remain the same, with
>>>> some allowance for solar activity effect on propagation.
>>>>
>>>> 73 and have fun in the SS CW!
>>>>
>>>> Don W4OC
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SECC mailing list
>>>> SECC at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SECC mailing list
>>> SECC at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SECC mailing list
>> SECC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20171103/25c38254/attachment-0001.html>