[SECC] qrz qsl

[Hal Kennedy]

These days Cort people seem to want QSLs via direct, and/or the bureau,
and/or LOTW, and/or QRZ, and/or eQSL, and/or OQRS and if not more options
today, then more tomorrow.

Pick the ones YOU want, but please don't pick none.  It's selfish to not
QSL at all.

I QSL direct, via the bureau and LOTW.

Some of the new FT8 software loads QSOs instantly to LOTW and I have heard
of people getting complaints via email if they had to wait a few hours for
a confirmation.  Personally that seems over the top to me....

73,
Hal N4GG



On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 7:47 AM, RJ Hubbard <rj.wf4w at gmail.com> wrote:

> QRZ.com has a free awards program that includes WAS. What he probably
> doesn't know is that you can upload your LoTW confirmations into QRZ so you
> don't have to pester people who don't use QRZ logbook :) I think by using
> LoTW you're doing doing all you need to do...
>
> RJ, WF4W
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:32 PM Courtney Judd <k4wi at k4wi.net> wrote:
>
>> Got an email request from a guy that I worked Saturday in the ALQ.... he
>> wanted me to go on qrz and confirm my qso with him so he could get WAS.
>> Didn't know that this existed or was proper. I have already uploaded to
>> LOTW and I always return  a card with a SASE request.... thoughts? 73's
>> Cort K4WI
>> _______________________________________________
>> SECC mailing list
>> SECC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20180906/816d33c0/attachment.html>