[SEDXC] ARRL assault on CW ??
MAllphin at aol.com
MAllphin at aol.com
Fri Mar 23 21:00:48 EST 2007
Sorry...operator error I am sure.....let's try again!
73, Bob
After reading NU0P's posting I contacted Dave Sumner, K1ZZ, for an
explanation. Here is what I received back.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Lew,
Just got home and found your voicemail. Sorry not to call back -- it's
late back here and I'm dragging a bit.
I don't know what's been posted, but here's an explanation. In a
nutshell, the alternative we went to the FCC to talk about was to make
practically no change at all below 28 MHz, except to add some protection
for narrowband CW/RTTY operators against wideband digital modes. What
some people seem to be missing is that there's no change at all to
97.305(a), which authorizes CW everywhere (except, for the moment, on the
five 60-meter channels). They're raising alarm bells about things that
have been in the rules for years. From some of the rhetoric, it's as if
they just tuned in to "War of the Worlds" and don't realize it's fiction.
73,
Dave K1ZZ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hope this clears things up.
73,
Lew Gordon, K4VX
************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
More information about the SEDXC
mailing list