[SEDXC] AT&T U-VERSE problem thread on QRZ.com

[Nancy]

I didn't thing AT&T even offered U-verse unless they had run the fiber optic 
cable.  I love it.  No problems with phone or internet (I kept Comcast for 
TV).  They ran fiber optic last year and offered it in the Spring.

73, Nancy NK4U

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "k4pi" <k4pi at bellsouth.net>
To: "David Thompson" <thompson at mindspring.com>; <sedxc at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [SEDXC] AT&T U-VERSE problem thread on QRZ.com


>I had checked into U Verse earlier in the summer and got a lot of emails of
> complaints about problems but when I wrote to the ARRL about what I had
> heard from other amateurs  ARRL said they  had not found any problems with 
> U
> Verse.  Please relay your findings and any other information you have to
> ARRL.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Thompson" <thompson at mindspring.com>
> To: <sedxc at contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 11:51 PM
> Subject: [SEDXC] AT&T U-VERSE problem thread on QRZ.com
>
>
>> It seems U-Verse can cause a major problem if all AT&T has in your area 
>> is
>> old phone lines.  The only cure is to get a fiber optic line into your
>> house
>> and subdivision or area.  Otherwise do not sign up for U-Verse.
>>
>> I finally went to Comcast as the Ultra DSL (1.7mps) was too slow for my
>> son
>> who is an on-line gamer.  Comcast provides 12mps.  The main problem I 
>> have
>> is I and other local amateurs have noted are spurs on 10 and 12 meters.
>> Some are loud as S7 but most are weak S2 or less.
>>
>> 73 Dave K4JRB
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SEDXC mailing list
>> SEDXC at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc
>
> _______________________________________________
> SEDXC mailing list
> SEDXC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sedxc