[Skimmertalk] RBN and busted calls was:Re: Skimmer Server & CQWW: one year late

[David Robbins]

i agree, aggressive was being way to restrictive in my skimmer server.  i went back to normal and it looked 'normal'... there were some busted calls but not too objectionable.

i run mine on a quad core 64bit box and cut it back to 6 bands at 96khz from my normal 7 bands at 192khz and it seemed happier.  i did see a high of 20 users connected to mine, i think that was affecting performance also... hopefully the rbn or ve7cc or other nodes will become more reliable so in the future users don't have to connect to individual skimmers.


Nov 30, 2010 11:14:48 AM, km3t at km3t.org wrote:

I ran in Normal mode because it seemed like Aggressive was being way
too restrictive. In retrospect I should have left it in Aggressive.
I am still getting up to speed on evaluating Skimmer performance.

I ran a QS1R in 96kHz mode hooked to two antennas:
1) A DX Engineering active receive vertical out in the woods.
2) An 80m OCF dipole up around 50-60 feet out in the woods.

I was running a temporary machine, 2GB RAM, Windows XP Home Media
Edition. I forget what CPU it had - it was a Dell desktop, several
years old. I was getting 100% decoding and I wasn't there so I didn't
get a chance to get any data on how many decoders were running.

Thanks for the .ini file tips - when I get a permanent machine I will
look more closely.

I am also trying to figure out how to spec a machine so I can run a
node more permanently.

73,
Dave KM3T


Ty K3MM wrote:
"I started out running aggressive the first night, but then switched
to Normal and I discovered that greatly increased the busted calls
coming from my node.  I was elsewhere operating the contest, so I
couldnt switch it back easily.  I noticed that KM3T also seemed to be
supplying a lot of busted calls."
_______________________________________________
Skimmertalk mailing list
Skimmertalk at contesting.com
http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk