[Skimmertalk] bad frecuencies spot

[Jorge Diez - CX6VM]

thanks for all the replies.

I don´t know if it´s a better way to fill N1MM bandmap with Skimmer spots,
than the N1MM Telnet windows?

What´s the RBN's ARCluster V6 Pete talked about? It´s a software? Could you
please give me the url to download it' I cannot found it.

What I noticed was that I wanted to go to a spot, click the call in the
bandmap and the radio (K3) went to 28033.5 and finally I founded the station
in 28032.5 for example, not in 28033.4 or 28033.3 that will not be a problem
for me.

This was strange, K1TTT´s spot in 28119 when I was running in 28062:

NC7J	K	NA	28062.6	10m	CW5W	CX	SA	CQ	10
11/12/2011 17:51
W3LPL	K	NA	28062.8	10m	CW5W	CX	SA	CQ	26
11/12/2011 17:51
K1TTT	K	NA	28119.3	10m	CW5W	CX	SA	CQ	10
11/12/2011 17:52
W8WTS	K	NA	28062.7	10m	CW5W	CX	SA	CQ	18
11/12/2011 17:52
N2AET	K	NA	28063.3	10m	CW5W	CX	SA	CQ	24
11/12/2011 17:57

thanks,
Jorge




-----Mensaje original-----
De: skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:skimmertalk-bounces at contesting.com] En nombre de Robert Chudek -
K0RC
Enviado el: Jueves, 15 de Diciembre de 2011 05:01 p.m.
Para: skimmertalk at contesting.com
Asunto: Re: [Skimmertalk] bad frecuencies spot

I think what Jorge was seeing is an artifact of the software problem 
that has been fixed in the latest release.

During the 160m contest I would be running a frequency for a long time. 
I would see a needed station pop onto my bandmap. I would click it to 
work him. Almost immediately my call sign would appear on his frequency 
after I called him. I would then resume my run frequency a kHz or more 
up the band. It would take "a while" for my call sign to reappear on my 
run frequency.

So there would be a period of time where my call sign was displayed on a 
frequency but I had "long gone" from that frequency. This happened a 
handful of times during the contest. I was going to write it up, but 
when I came to the reflector I saw the problem had already been 
identified and was being fixed.

If this was happening to me, there were probably instances where Jorge 
got caught in this "station disappearing act" during the contest.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 12/14/2011 5:55 AM, Pete Smith wrote:
> I don't know why you should be seeing such large variations.  We have
> worked hard to get everyone within 0.1 KHz.  During CQWW CW we had three
> stations appear whose frequency calibration was off up to 400 Hz, and
> three more who were off 100 Hz.  All of these are being contacted to
> encourage them to clean up the problem.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>
> The World Contest Station Database, updated daily
atwww.conteststations.com
> The Reverse Beacon Network athttp://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
> spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 AND now
> at arcluster.reversebeacon.net port 7000
>
>
>
> On 12/14/2011 5:46 AM, Jorge Diez - CX6VM wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We used for the first time Skimmer through N1MM Telnet windows with VE7CC
>> cluster.
>>
>> Since we are new with that, maybe is common, but I want to know why the
>> difference in the frequency of the Skimmer spots.
>>
>> It was curious how we couldn´t find the stations in the spotted
frequency.
>> We moved around to find them. Sometimes 1 khz ahead.
>>
>> 73,
>> Jorge
>> CX6VM/CW5W
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Skimmertalk mailing list
>> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
>> http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Skimmertalk mailing list
> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
> http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
>
_______________________________________________
Skimmertalk mailing list
Skimmertalk at contesting.com
http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
-----
Se certificó que el correo no contiene virus.
Comprobada por AVG - www.avg.es
Versión: 2012.0.1890 / Base de datos de virus: 2108/4682 - Fecha de la
versión: 15/12/2011