[Skimmertalk] S9-C SDR CW Skimmer report

[Prasad VU2PTT]

Dai and all,

The URL links seem to be broken, the below worked for me after a bit of
editing:

S9-C = 8 bands 192kHz
http://59925.org/sh5/jf2iwl/2016/2016_s9-c_sdr_8_bands_48h_spots_jf2iwl_s/
5,052 stations total , 92 countries captured

QS1R = 7 bands 192kHz
http://59925.org/sh5/jf2iwl/2016/2016_qs1r_sdr_7_bands_48h_spots_jf2iwl_s/
4,464 stations total , 86 countries



73 de Prasad VU2PTT


On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Dai NAGAKURA <ndai at cameo.plala.or.jp> wrote:

> Dear members de JF2IWL
>
> I have got another Core i7 PC
> then again  I report the quantitative comparison of QS1R and S9-C
> from each local Spots.txt of  CW SkimmerServer 7 bands and 8 bands.
>
> Antenna : Diamond Antenna's 5 Band GP splitted by two divider
> PreAmp : Diamond Antenna's DMAX50
>
> PC : Core i7 2700k 3.5MHz , 16GB Memory Win7 64bit Pro.for S9-C
>      : Core i7 960    3.2GHz , 2MB memory  Win7 64 bit Pro for QS1R
>
> Analysis by SH5 Contest analyzer
>
> S9-C = 8 bands 192kHz
> http://59925.org/sh5/jf2iwl/2016/2016_s9-c_sdr_8_bands_48h_spots_jf2iwl_s/
> 5,052 stations total , 92 countries captured
>
> QS1R = 7 bands 192kHz
> http://59925.org/sh5/jf2iwl/2016/2016_qs1r_sdr_7_bands_48h_spots_jf2iwl_s/
> 4,464 stations total , 86 countries
>
> It's very sorry  I missed the SkimServ Beacon setting of QS1R
> Then QS1R did not capture IBP beacons. S9-C does.
>
> About the PC load, S9-C's is superior than QS1R's
> However I did not feel big deference , both PC load is almost same
> 7 ~ 10%.
>
> #Please NOTE
> I am just a ceramic artist ,NOT a salesperson of S9-C.
> I share just only the fact of my result in this ML
>
> Dai JF2IWL
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dai NAGAKURA <ndai at cameo.plala.or.jp>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Skimmertalk mailing list
> Skimmertalk at contesting.com
> http://dayton.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/skimmertalk
>