[TenTec] VI+ Reveiw

Paul Christensen paulc@mediaone.net
Wed, 4 Mar 1998 09:28:42 -0500

The trouble I have with CQ's product reviews is that they're oftentimes
nothing more than a summary of a manufacturer's product literature.  What's
missing a bona fide and comprehensive review and evaluation of the product.
An entire "review" of only the Omni's features is worthless and nonsensical
to me.  As far as I'm concerned, they're wasting print material and my time.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ross F. Guldenbrein NW6R <east3rd@sj.bigger.net>
To: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 04, 1998 7:01 AM
Subject: [TenTec] VI+ Reveiw

>Hey Guys,
>Just finished reading a review of the Omni VI+ in the newest CQ!  Those
>interested may want to check it out.  73 Ross  nw6r
> ps. still looking for that 263G ..
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm