[TenTec] TT Orion: Also SEMI-BK-IN possible ?

Sinisa Hristov shristov at ptt.yu
Sun Dec 28 00:40:50 EST 2003


"Paul Christensen, Esq." wrote:

> 1) Specifically, what is the root problem that needs correction?

Enable PTT functionality for CW,
just like all the other manufacturers
have been doing for decades.


> 2) What 5-cent change are you referring to?

It may range from zero cents (firmware change)
to a resistor/diode/wire or so. Nothing more than that.


> 3) What is the outcome of the 5-cent change?

a) PTT would enable people to use existing non-QSK amplifiers;
b) PTT would enable using non-QSK amplifiers without
     delaying reception as caused by Semi-BK-In;
c) PTT would save relays on QSK amplifiers.


> 4) What is it in your proposal that cannot be remedied either with Orion's
> semi-break-in, QSK, or TX OUT/TX EN amplifier enabling system?

Without PTT you can have some of a), b) or c) above, but not all of them.

This is very significant to people not wishing to:
a) buy another amplifier just to conform to TenTec QSK dogma;
c) miss half-a-callsign on RX due to Semi-BK-In delay;
b) burn relays on QSK amplifiers.

The same thing is completely irrelevant to other people who do not care about:
a) buying another amplifier just to conform to TenTec QSK dogma;
c) or do not care about misssing half-a-callsign on RX due to Semi-BK-In delay;
b) or do not care about burning QSK relays.

So, technically, it's very simple.

Emotionally it may not be so simple,
as this unnecessarily heated discussion shows.


73,

Sinisa  YT1NT, VA3TTN


More information about the TenTec mailing list