[TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition

[Bob Henderson]

That sounds very reasonable to me.  So far as I can see, there are many
discerning operators on this reflector but their likes and dislikes vary.
The best advice seems to be, " use what works for you".

73 Bob, 5B4AGN


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown at verizon.net>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition


> Hi Bob,
>
> Okay, fine. I first experienced QSK with a Kenwood TS-440SAT. It was
> pretty good. I got spoiled and could not go back to slower "semi-breakin".
> I heard that Ten Tec had really good QSK, so I bought a used Omni VI. I
> think it is fantastic. Now I would not be satisfied with anything with
> QSK slower than what my Omni VI has.
>
> I see a lot of postings here that say the Orion's QSK is less than
> satisfactory. But then, I see some that say the Omni VI is no good too.
> So I take it all with a grain of salt. ... Anyway, I like to use QSK and
> I like the way it works in my Omni VI.
>
> 73 DE N6KB
>
>  Bob Henderson wrote:
>
> >Ken
> >
> >Your observation is correct but..............
> >
> >The kind of QSK Ten Tec became famous for used to be referred to as FULL
QSK
> >to distinguish it from more pedestrian manifestations. As time went on we
> >became used to referring to FULL QSK as QSK and the lesser variant became
> >Semi Break-in.
> >
> >The strict Q code definition of QSK remains unchanged but it's useage has
> >moved on.
> >
> >Bob, 5B4AGN
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>