[TenTec] Re: IP vs.DR

[NJ0IP]

Lawrence,

Can you be more specific on "in RadCom" please.
After all, it is a magazine that is published every month.
I even subscribe to it but I only keep back issues for about 2 years.
Tnx

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Lawrence Stoskopf
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 8:43 AM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Re: IP vs.DR

Chadwick (sp?) had a good writeup on this in RadCom and maybe even in one of

the ARRL pubs.  Something like "How much DR do we need".  Really covered it 
from the Eu situation.  As I recall, the new rigs are close. 

As for monitoring the RF output quality, some of the old guys, in the 50s 
when I got my Novice,  were simply putting an RF sample from the line 
directly to the vertical deflection plates of their scopes.  Solved the 
problem of limited bandwidth amplifiers in the scopes.  As I recall, those 
were hacked (that term hadn't been used yet I suspect) from surplus military

radar equipment or such. 

N0UU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec