In a message dated 8/3/2006 3:12:42 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, gsm at mendelson.com writes: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:00:40PM -0700, Grant Youngman wrote: > Frankly, since it's something other than SNOBOL and the underlying machine > architecture isn't bi-quinary, I'm not so sure that the whole thing isn't a > fool's errand ;-) how about CPM