[TenTec] O2 Tx Audio

[John Nason / NA9U]

I get many compliments on my transmit audio as well. 
I use the stock Ten Tec mike, the 706A with stock
settings.  I am quite pleased with it.  

I am quite pleased with all aspects of the radio
including the NR, QSK and other features.  If I read
this reflector before buying my O2 I never would have.
 

I don't get it?  Why don't you guys just sell the
things on e-bay.  You'll get a good price and you can
move on.  

73,
John NA9U

--- Scott Harwood <scotth at hsc.edu> wrote:

> 
> I have received nothing but compliments on my tx
> audio using Orion II and Studio One mike.  As with
> almost everything else with the Orion II, it takes
> some study and care setting it up.  I plugged a
> cassette recorder into the monitor output and went
> through numerous settings of TxEQ, Low Freq Cutoff
> and Speech Processing stating into the microphone
> what each setting was while transmitting into a
> dummy load.  I then played the recorder back through
> my home stereo with no sound (base or treble)
> enhancement and selected the one that sounded the
> most natural for those 75 meter rag chews, the most
> piercing and penetrating for dx pileups, etc.  I got
> the XYL to also verify the “natural” sound.  
> 
> Just a suggestion on what worked for me.
> 
> 73 all
> 
> Scott K4VWK
> 
> ---------- Original Message
> ----------------------------------
> From: "Ron Castro" <ronc at sonic.net>
> Reply-To: Ron Castro <ronc at sonic.net>,Discussion of
> Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec at contesting.com>
> Date:  Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:45:12 -0800
> 
> >Maybe they need to bring Doug Smith, KF6DX back for
> a consult.
> >
> >Ron Castro
> >Chief Technical Officer
> >Results Radio, LLC
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: <Kc9cdt at aol.com>
> >To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> >Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:47 PM
> >Subject: Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio
> >
> >
> >> Well, that's unfortunate, as I think they did a
> superb job in early 
> >> testing.
> >> Really taking the place of a department for TT.
> >>
> >> Now TT is going to have to do a lot better on
> there own in QC and 
> >> regression
> >> test and analysis. So far not so good IMHO.
> >>
> >> I'm still rooting for them, but ?????
> >> Maybe they need additional help with the
> programming (outside help)?
> >>
> >> Seems like more people are happier with the
> version 2 for Orion than OII
> >> right now.
> >> You would think the code (logic) would be the
> same with the exeption of
> >> drivers for the screen and maybe some differences
> in the filter chain.
> >>
> >> I vote for going back to 1.xxx  for OII and
> improving from there... I 
> >> know...
> >> too late!
> >> Lee
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> TenTec mailing list
> >> TenTec at contesting.com
> >>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >>
> >> 
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >TenTec mailing list
> >TenTec at contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>  
> 
> 
>                    
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>