[TenTec] Wow!

[Douglas Shock]

I would agree that the process of setting up LOTW is rather cumbersome and I
work in the industry so I am not a stranger to any of this weird science.

I for one am very disappointed on my return rat for qsling and am surprised
that anyone is capable of achieving dxcc let alone WAS on this system.

The young lady that oversees this system is however top notch and I am sure
she is feeling overwhelmed by the amount of work created by this archaic
system.

I agree...LOTW II is in need.

to make it reflector worthy...any chance of tying in qso's directly from my
Orion into LOTW to bypass the cert monkey business?

On 3/14/07, Carl Moreschi <n4py at arrl.net> wrote:
>
> My QSO's are over a 30 year period with the higher amount being the older
> ones.  I suspect that has something to do with the low rate.  But there
> are
> only about 15,000 hams registered world wide to LOTW.  So that's the
> problem.
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 121 Little Bell Drive
> Bell Mountain
> Hays, NC 28635
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Gaines AD8P" <ad8p at wcoil.com>
> To: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py at arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
> <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Wow!
>
>
> > 18.37% here based on 31,200 QSO's uploaded
> >
> > As an analyst I would then advise you to make more QSO's so your
> percentage
> > will go up    ;>)
> >
> > Bill AD8P
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py at arrl.net>
> > To: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams at telus.net>
> > Cc: "tentec" <tentec at contesting.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Wow!
> >
> >
> > >I was wrong about the 20% LOTW QSL rate.  I just checked it and for me
> it
> > >is
> > > 9.6%
> > >
> > > 73,
> > >
> > > Carl Moreschi N4PY
> > > 121 Little Bell Drive
> > > Bell Mountain
> > > Hays, NC 28635
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams at telus.net>
> > > To: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py at arrl.net>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:03 PM
> > > Subject: Wow!
> > >
> > >
> > >> That's amazing.
> > >>
> > >> My QSL return rate with LoTW is just a bit over 6.5%.  You are
> extremely
> > >> fortunate.
> > >>
> > >> 73,
> > >>
> > >> Rick
> > >> VE7TK
> > >>
> > >> Website:  http://www3.telus.net/ve7tk
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>       Subject:  Re: [TenTec] Is anyone using straight email for
> QSLing
> > > now?
> > >>       From:  "Carl Moreschi" <n4py at arrl.net>
> > >>
> > >>       Date:  Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:15:38 -0400
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> EQSL is not recognized by the ARRL for anything.  Only LOTW works for
> > >> ARRL
> > >> awards.  I use LOTW.  It works fairly well but needs much more
> > >> participation.   My confirmation rate is somewhere in the 20 to 25
> > >> percent
> > >> range.  To get credit for an award, the fee is between 10 and 20
> cents
> > >> per
> > >> confirmation.  The ARRL says they have to do this to offset the huge
> > >> development cost they had in getting this developed.
> > >>
> > >> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> > >> 121 Little Bell Drive
> > >> Bell Mountain
> > >> Hays, NC 28635
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.11/721 - Release Date:
> 3/13/2007
> > > 4:51 PM
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>