[TenTec] K4VUD & Titan 425

[Ron Notarius W3WN]

Well Rob, my primary concern was to get Charles some help (and this despite
being ticked off at him for violating rules on the reflector I administer...
again...) for his amplifier, without getting into the specifics of his
comments.

I have not dealt personally with Paul Clinton, so I felt very uncomfortable
relaying Charles complaint about the man (whether Charles is right or wrong,
something I obviously can have no opinion on).  And I felt that Charles
subsequent rant about Ten Tec the company inappropriate to say the least...
and again, it was not something I felt comfortable relaying third hand.

If you'd like to repost Charles comments, though, please be my guest.  I'm
sure others have seen them on some of the other reflectors by now, in any
case.

Bottom line is that I felt doing so would be counter-productive to getting
him some assistance, as I could understand where some would tell him that if
he felt that way, he should stick his amplifier where solar energy would
never penetrate.

And yes, he should have posted his comments here himself, and I've already
told him as much.  (Guess I can forget about working him in HS in the near
future! <g>)

73

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Rob Atkinson
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:38 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] K4VUD & Titan 425


Ron, you go on at length about Charles's so called "rant" which I have read,
and then you don't expect comment following your post?  That seems
disingenuous to me.    As for Charles, he should have posted his problem
right here.

*"If you haven't seen it: Trust me. You won't like it."

I disagree.  I think Charles has a legitimate complaint.  His problem is not
the first of this sort.

73,

Rob / K5UJ

*
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec