[TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
Duane Calvin
ac5aa1 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 16 18:03:27 EDT 2008
I don't think the concept was to pay for fixes, but to pay for new firmware
functions. However, after some period of time, it might be reasonable to
charge for ongoing "support" much like many software companies do. This
presumes a certain level of quality from the outset.
73, Duane
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
www.ac5aa.com
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Kc9cdt at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:58 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
Tom,
Why in the world would you want to pay for firmware updates to fix a product
that you have and still is not right? I am not talking about optional
features
here.
Just curious where you are comming from?
Am I missing something here?
Lee
**************
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used
car listings at AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list