[TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report

[VE1BN]

Carl -

Yes, Paul said there was a very slight chirp that he noted.  His ears are a 
lot better than mine, obviously.
I see nothing though on my Philips 120 meg scope when watching the RF output 
from an in-line RF
sampler.  Have had no one else mention a chirp.  Oh yes, Paul said I have no 
clicks with which I concur.

73 -  Don




 ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py at arrl.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report


> So what was the final verdict.  Do you have a chirp or not?
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> 121 Little Bell Drive
> Bell Mountain
> Hays, NC 28635
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "VE1BN" <ve1bn at eastlink.ca>
> To: "N4YG" <n4yg at comcast.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
> <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 11:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report
>
>
>> Joe, N4YG -
>>
>> I work fast (enough) CW with full QSK with my OMNI 6+ and a home brewed
>> linear 500 Watt QSK amplifier. QSK was added to my amp by copying the
>> Titan's circuitry and making the boards that were fitted into the amp 
>> some
>> 10 years ago.  Break-in is always used here. Good to listen through when
>> working pileups, too.
>>
>> This combined system has had no bad effect on QSK that I am aware of.
> Last
>> evening I had an enjoyable QSO with Paul, W9AC, who broke me QSK-wise 
>> with
>> no problem, to make a comment.
>>
>> 73 -
>>
>> Don,  ve1bn at eastlink.ca
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "N4YG" <n4yg at comcast.net>
>> To: "TenTec Discussion" <tentec at contesting.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 10:58 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report
>>
>>
>> > Well it seems that Don is very happy with the Logic EPROM version 1.02
>> > solution, but Paul says it only partially masks the problem at the
> expense
>> > of QSK. What is the effect on QSK? I guess I will just have to try
> version
>> > 1.02 and see for myself?
>> >
>> > Joe, N4YG
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TenTec mailing list
>> > TenTec at contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec