[TenTec] K3 vs Orion One
Charles Harpole
k4vud at hotmail.com
Wed May 14 08:10:24 EDT 2008
Actually the facts are these...
I did not have lightning damage... the TT cust serv suggested that as an answer but it was
not the case. I merely asked for suggestions if the problem I had was typical and thus they may
have a standard fix already in mind, or for other suggestions. The response was a single
sentence of no help and no promise of further investigation. I did not expect so little, but
would even have taken a "we can not afford to answer questions about this product anymore"
if company and market forces had come to that. I do not expect magic.
But the answer was so simplistic and mis directed and BRIEF to be vy disappointing. And, I was
working with a unit that had just returned from factory repair and had the same problem.
Where I may live is not a factor when making a simple query by email ..to be answered by cheap
email. BTW, I really like my ORION one. Thanks for the chance to set this little record straight.
73
Charles Harpole
k4vud at hotmail.com
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 07:36:48 -0400> From: wn3vaw at verizon.net> To: tentec at contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TenTec] K3 vs Orion One> > With all due respect Charles, you're still upset that Ten-Tec wouldn't> repair or replace a lightning-damaged rig with little or no inconvenience or> expense to you. And some of your mass-emails to other lists about that have> conveniently not mentioned that you are now living in Thailand not the US,> which puts a futher level of complexity in any customer service issue.> > Further, I would strongly disagree with your opinion of the Orion. Bill> W3WH was kind enough to let me use his Orion (when he still had it) on many> occasions, and I never ran into major difficulties with the rig -- and I> never saw the manual. I will grant you that some of the menu controls are> not intuitive, but I was still able to operate (quite succesfully) just> flying by the seat of my pants.> > 73> > -----Original Message-----> From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com> [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Charles Harpole> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:45 PM> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment> Subject: Re: [TenTec] K3 vs Orion One> > > > I, too, have encountered vy poor response from TT customer "service." What> a shame that their good> > products should be so poorly represented by their public face. I certainly> hope that TT has another> > source of income other than ham radio because they (1) do not know how to> sell their radios to hams,> > and (2) have a customer service with terrible people skills.> > To TT: (1) publish some b&w text ads to teach hams how to adjust and use> your ORIONs.... these rigs> > are poor just of the box and if a user never explores A LOT, he will> bad-mouth the radio, etc. The ORIONs are> > not your father's receiver and are best operated vy different from earlier> generations of ham radios.... users> > and potential customers MUST have this info from the factory... some "Tech> Talks".... to get their radios> > to perform to full abilities (good stuf on this topic in the manual is not> enuf).> > (2) hire an otherwise retired loquacious ham to be the first answer to ur> customer service phones and Internet.> > Tell the guy that his job is to FIRST make the customer feel valued and> SECOND to promise to get answers to> > the problem AND THEN GET BACK TO HIM FAST. Hams are unique customers who> WANT TO TALK and a smart> > ham radio company provides that chance.... warm fuzzy is the best start,> followed up with real hard answers.> > PLEASE TT, we want u to succeed and put out these great products.... you> should have already--with the ORION One--> > have been the rig of choice for the majority of hams based on their> performance. You have to ask why that is not true.Charles> Harpolek4vud at hotmail.com > From: k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com> To:> tentec at contesting.com> Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:29:19 -0700> Subject: Re:> [TenTec] K3 vs Orion One> > On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:11:04 -0400, Dick Green> WC1M wrote:> > >Elecraft is performing at a very high level thus far. >> >Unfortunately, by not addressing many outstanding firmware > issues,> >I> feel TT has basically abandoned a large group of loyal users.> > There is a> HUGE difference between the two companies in user > support and online> presence. The Elecraft list has hundreds of > posts each day, upper level> Elecraft management (like the two > owners, one of whom is the chief> engineer!) is always monitoring > it, and responds directly when needed.> That list is separate from > the K3 beta list, which they also actively> monitor and contribute > to. > > By contrast, TenTec's presence on> this list is limited to posting > a list of used/demo gear once or twice a> month and VERY occasional > responses by a salesman to the most outrageous> misunderstandings > or negative comments about products. > > In other words,> Elecraft respects their customers by actively > participating in the email> lists, listening to the traffic, and > learning of their customers' needs> and desires, while Ten Tec > seems to consider this list so trivial as to be> unworthy of their > time. > > I find that quite sad. The late Al Kahn, K4FW,> co-founder of Ten > Tec, and before that co-founder of Electro-Voice and> strong > supporter of Heathkit and ARRL, has long been one of my heroes. > >> 73,> > Jim Brown K9YC> > > _______________________________________________>> TenTec mailing list> TenTec at contesting.com>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec> _______________________________________________> TenTec mailing list> TenTec at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec> > _______________________________________________> TenTec mailing list> TenTec at contesting.com> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
More information about the TenTec
mailing list