[TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

[Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP]

John,

Yes, I guess it's not the right paper if you haven't been following RX
performance for a while.

You know, we all started out without any information on receivers and when I
first got interested in them in the mid 70's, I was confused too.  I read a
few articles by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI.  I think I might still have some of them
somewhere.

I read everything I could get ahold of, in English and in German.
Eventually we reached a point where almost all radios had positive Intercept
Points, and each new one seemed to be 1 or 2 dB more than the last.  So we
all started to ask, "How much do we need".

Seems like this might be a good topic for a serious of "simple" articles for
QST.
I'm not sure who we could get to write them.

Let me do some research for you.  Maybe I can find something simpler to
begin with.

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces at contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Molenda
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:10 PM
To: tentec at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

  I went to

_  by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX_, as suggested and
attempted to read the
article I am sure it was a great read for a tech but for me the common guy
who has other
talents it was too much .  I have little understanding of the theory needed
to absorb
such a technical article . This I believe is the same reason TT should drill
any holes into
the Eagle body to bring any connection out . John kb2huk
May/June 2002.


On 9/30/2010 1:19 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
>   by Peter E. Chadwick, G3RZP, and published in QEX,
> May/June 2002.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec