[TenTec] What Radio?

[Kris Merschrod]

I'm picking up the thread a few days late.  Asidefrom the contesting and 
rare-DXing, there is a whole world of plain old morning or evening QSOs with 
friends that, because of seasonal changes or propogation fluctuation, when 
the linear makes for comfortable QSOs.  In the phone patching days the 
linear was also a great help.  These are sort of routine cicumstances where 
an amp makes life enjoyable.

Kris KM2KM


Merschrod
San Francisco, CA
www.merschrod.net
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jack" <jfriend31 at comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What Radio?


>I agree totally. I have 100 W and know that any boost would have helped in
> several cases over the years. I have missed considerable DX because I 
> could
> not increase the power. there are many stations I have heard but could not
> hear me due to QRM or QRN.
> jack
> ak7o
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Frank Kirschner
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 7:35 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] What Radio?
>
> The notion that there is no difference between 100 watts and 200 watts is
> flawed. There is a little over 3dB difference, which often makes the
> difference between a QSO, albeit a rough one, and no QSO at all. I have 
> many
> QSL cards that I would not have, if I had been limited to 100 watts.
>
> I've tried it over and over. When the band is just coming up or going out,
> when the QRM or QRN is high, I've switched between 200 and 100 watts, and 
> it
> made the difference between being copied and not being copied.
>
> Signal to noise ratio depends on the signal strength and the noise power. 
> If
> 100 watts puts you at or just under the noise level, 200 watts will result
> in a copyable signal. True, if 100 watts gives you S9 at the distant end,
> then 200 watts won't make any useful difference. But most of my DX 
> contacts,
> especially the rare ones, have been other than S9. If you choose to 
> operate
> 100 watts for the challenge, good for you. But there is a difference.
>
> In addition, when I run 50 watts on RTTY with a 100-watt transmitter, I 
> have
> to be very careful about duty cycle and giving the finals a rest. When I 
> run
> 50 watts with my 200-watt transmitter, I don't.
>
> 73,
> Frank
> KF6E
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Christensen
> Sent: 08/30/11 07:53 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] What Radio?
>
>> Besides receiver specs, the '5000 runs 200 watts out, which often means >
>> the difference between a manageable QSO and none, compared with 100 
>> watts.
>> I've mostly considered the 200-watt feature as a Madison Avenue marketing
>> gimmick. This appeals to folks who only live in a linear world (i.e., if
>> one is good, two is twice as good). We could make the same argument when
>> going from 50 to 100 watts, and 500 watts to 1KW.
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec