[TenTec] rx 366

[Barry N1EU]

John, you should contact Ten-Tec for an answer.  Nobody on this
reflector is going to know the ins and outs of the RX366 as well as
the Ten-Tec engineering staff.

Barry N1EU

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:19 PM, John Molenda <cdistflatfoot at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 5:58 PM, Barry N1EU wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:16 PM,<kc9cdt at aol.com>  wrote:
>>> I was told that it is GC, but the original second RX was a little better in that mode..
>> I suspect the RX366 is actually a BETTER gc rx in all respects than
>> the original except for out of band rejection.  That's also assuming
>> you have the appropriate roofing filter installed (original didn't
>> need roofing filters).
>>
>> But I could be wrong.
>>
>> Barry N1EU
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> So I am getting that the General coverage Reciver in the RX366 is as
> least as good as the one in the Eagle . Am I assimilating this
> information correct ?  If the GC rx is as good as the Eagle I will think
> about getting one .  Are there any roofing filters that will assist the
> RX366 in tuning or listening to General coverage receive?  thanks John
> kb2huk
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec