[TenTec] eagle

[Barry N1EU]

Doesn't make sense that there isn't dsp filtering ahead of the xtal
filtering.

73,
Barry N1EU

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:09 PM, mcelmer1 <mcelmer1 at netecin.net> wrote:

> Makes sense.
>
> Mike
> W8TRN
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq at dejazzd.com>
>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 11:21
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle
>
>
>
>  I installed the filter in the am slot did a a/b test on 40m with 4 hams
>> got better audio with 2.8 than 2.4.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Barry N1EU
>> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 4:24 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] eagle
>>
>> Is that filter is in the tx signal path of the Eagle?  The tx signal isn't
>> filtered entirely in dsp with configurable bandwidth?
>>
>> 73,
>> Barry N1EU
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Rodney <w3krq at dejazzd.com> wrote:
>>
>>  I got a 2.8 filter from inrad  for my Eagle  got great audio reports.
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>>>
>>>  ______________________________**_________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>