[TenTec] RF Speech Processor

[Reed Krenn]

That man has a *stranglehold* on reality!

Regards,

Reed WW3A


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw at blomand.net>wrote:

> I recall a comment made to me recently by a very highlyl respected audio
> and recording engineer.  "In the 70's we had talent.  Today we seem to have
> only technology".   Perhaps that better explains what we hear on the bands
> today.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rippey" <w3uls73 at gmail.com>
> To: <tentec at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 8:14 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor
>
>
>
>  Dave Hammond! I am so glad to see a posting by you on this thread! Long
>> time no see. I always have read with interest what you have had to say.
>>
>> I will consider carefully what you, Bob and Gary have said. My sense is
>> there is a lot that can be done (without splatter) to make 100 watts work
>> more effectively. NA1A 's video I mentioned is not conclusive but it does
>> support the idea.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> John, W3ULS
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>